Macbrair v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 20 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED, 17 plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED, and 18 the commissioner's crossmotion to affirm is GRANTED.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Carissa M. Macbrair, 2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK 5 Plaintiff 6 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, Granting Crossmotion to Affirm, and Closing Case v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 8 Defendant [ECF Nos. 17, 18, 20] 9 10 On February 2, 2017, the magistrate judge recommended that I deny plaintiff’s motion to 11 remand and grant the commissioner’s crossmotion to affirm. “[N]o review is required of a 12 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”1 Objections to the 13 magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by February 16, 2017, and Macbrair has not 14 filed an objection or requested an extension to do so. 15 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate 16 judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 20] is ADOPTED, plaintiff’s motion to remand [ECF 17 No. 17] is DENIED, and the commissioner’s crossmotion to affirm [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED. 18 The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 19 Dated this 22nd day of February, 2017. 20 _________________________________ _________________________ _ ___ ___ _ _ Jennifer A. Dorsey nnifer A Dorsey fe fe e United States District Judge Judge nited States d tate u 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?