Macbrair v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 20 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED, 17 plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED, and 18 the commissioner's crossmotion to affirm is GRANTED.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Carissa M. Macbrair,
2:16-cv-01048-JAD-NJK
5
Plaintiff
6
7
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation, Denying Motion to
Remand, Granting Crossmotion to
Affirm, and Closing Case
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
8
Defendant
[ECF Nos. 17, 18, 20]
9
10
On February 2, 2017, the magistrate judge recommended that I deny plaintiff’s motion to
11
remand and grant the commissioner’s crossmotion to affirm. “[N]o review is required of a
12
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”1 Objections to the
13
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation were due by February 16, 2017, and Macbrair has not
14
filed an objection or requested an extension to do so.
15
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate
16
judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 20] is ADOPTED, plaintiff’s motion to remand [ECF
17
No. 17] is DENIED, and the commissioner’s crossmotion to affirm [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED.
18
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
19
Dated this 22nd day of February, 2017.
20
_________________________________
_________________________
_ ___ ___
_ _
Jennifer A. Dorsey
nnifer A Dorsey
fe
fe
e
United States District Judge
Judge
nited States
d tate
u
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?