Lennox v. Wehrly et al

Filing 21

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 17 and 19 Motions to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SHARON WEHRLY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
PETRA LENNOX,

Case No. 2:16-cv-01055-APG-CWH

ORDER

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Petra Lennox’s motions to quash (ECF No. 17 and
19). To date, Defendant has not filed a response.
Plaintiff seeks to quash Defendant’s notice of deposition of Jason G. Weiner, Esq. Under

13

Local Rule 26-7(c), discovery motions will not be considered unless the movant (1) has made a

14

good-faith effort to meet and confer as defined in LR IA 1-3(f) before filing the motion, and (2)

15

includes a declaration setting forth the details and results of the meet-and-confer conference about

16

each disputed discovery request. Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant has not complied with

17

the above requirements.

18
19

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to quash (ECF No. 17 and 19) are
DENIED.

20
21

DATED: December 22, 2016.

22
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1