McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 69 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 49 , 51 Motions for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 2/27/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF Document 69 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 2
1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 03062
2 Email: Robert.Freeman@lewisbrisbois.com
PAMELA L. MCGAHA
3 Nevada Bar No. 08181
Email: Pamela.McGaha@lewisbrisbois.com
4 CHERYL A. GRAMES
Nevada Bar No. 12752
5 Email: Cheryl.Grames@lewisbrisbois.com
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
7 702.893.3383
FAX: 702.893.3789
8 Attorneys for Defendant
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
9 Company
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
15
16
***
LORENE MCCALL,
Plaintiff,
vs.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
17 INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1
through 10, inclusive, and ROE
18 CORPORATIONS I through 10, inclusive,
19
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
REPLY DUE DATES OF THE PARTIES’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
ECF No. 69
Defendants.
20
21
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54 and LR IA 6-1, Defendant State Farm Mutual
22 Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Lorene McCall (“Plaintiff”)
23 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to
24 extend the Reply due dates in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment as follows:
25
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary
26 Judgment (ECF No. 49);
27
LEWIS
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Motion for Partial Summary
28 Judgment (ECF No. 51);
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4833-0766-5501.1
Case 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF Document 69 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 2
1
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant’s
2 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 62);
3
WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion
4 for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 64);
5
WHEREAS, due to the schedules of counsel and additional time needed to
6 prepare the Parties’ replies in support of their respective motions;
7
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS
8 HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows:
9
10
The briefing schedule shall be amended as follows:
Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment: February
11 27, 2018; and,
12
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of Her Motion for Partial Summary Judgment:
13 February 27, 2018.
14
DATED this 13th day of February, 2018.
DATED this 13th day of February, 2018.
15
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
GANZ & HAUF
/s/ Pamela L. McGahah
Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 3062
Pamela L. McGaha, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8181
Cheryl A. Grames, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
/s/ Marjorie Hauf
Marjorie Hauf, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8111
Cara Xidis, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11743
8950 W. Tropicana Avenue
Suite 1
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Defendant
23
ORDER
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this
day 2018
February 14,of
27
LEWIS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
, 2018.
HON. JENNIFER A. DORSEY
NNIFER DORSEY
NI
NI E
O S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT
T RI
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4833-0766-5501.1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?