McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Filing 70

ORDER Granting 69 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 49 , 51 Motions for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 2/27/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF Document 69 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 2 1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN Nevada Bar No. 03062 2 Email: Robert.Freeman@lewisbrisbois.com PAMELA L. MCGAHA 3 Nevada Bar No. 08181 Email: Pamela.McGaha@lewisbrisbois.com 4 CHERYL A. GRAMES Nevada Bar No. 12752 5 Email: Cheryl.Grames@lewisbrisbois.com LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 7 702.893.3383 FAX: 702.893.3789 8 Attorneys for Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 9 Company 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 16 *** LORENE MCCALL, Plaintiff, vs. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 17 INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and ROE 18 CORPORATIONS I through 10, inclusive, 19 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND REPLY DUE DATES OF THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 69 Defendants. 20 21 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54 and LR IA 6-1, Defendant State Farm Mutual 22 Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Lorene McCall (“Plaintiff”) 23 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to 24 extend the Reply due dates in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment as follows: 25 WHEREAS, on January 12, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary 26 Judgment (ECF No. 49); 27 LEWIS WHEREAS, on January 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Motion for Partial Summary 28 Judgment (ECF No. 51); BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4833-0766-5501.1 Case 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF Document 69 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 2 1 WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant’s 2 Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 62); 3 WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, Defendant filed its Response to Plaintiff’s Motion 4 for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 64); 5 WHEREAS, due to the schedules of counsel and additional time needed to 6 prepare the Parties’ replies in support of their respective motions; 7 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS 8 HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows: 9 10 The briefing schedule shall be amended as follows: Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment: February 11 27, 2018; and, 12 Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of Her Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: 13 February 27, 2018. 14 DATED this 13th day of February, 2018. DATED this 13th day of February, 2018. 15 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP GANZ & HAUF /s/ Pamela L. McGahah Robert W. Freeman, Jr., Esq. Nevada Bar No. 3062 Pamela L. McGaha, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8181 Cheryl A. Grames, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12752 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 /s/ Marjorie Hauf Marjorie Hauf, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8111 Cara Xidis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11743 8950 W. Tropicana Avenue Suite 1 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant 23 ORDER 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this day 2018 February 14,of 27 LEWIS Attorneys for Plaintiff , 2018. HON. JENNIFER A. DORSEY NNIFER DORSEY NI NI E O S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT T RI 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4833-0766-5501.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?