Vanamann v FIA Card Services NA
Filing
43
ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
Christopher P. Burke, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 004093
atty@cburke.lvcoxmail.com
218 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas NV 89101
(702) 385-7987
Attorney for Plaintiff
Kim Vanamann
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
Kim Vanamann, individually
and on behalf others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01071-RFB-CWH
v.
15
16
17
FIA CARD SERVICES NA
1100 North King St.
Wilmington DE 19884
18
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
23
24
COME NOW, Plaintiff Kim Vanamann (“Vanamann”), and Defendant Bank of
25
America, N.A., for itself and as successor by merger to FIA Card Services, NA (“Defendant”
26
or “BANA”), by and through their respective counsel of record in the above-captioned
27
matter, and hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to LR 7-1, as follows:
28
1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
2
1.
3
The parties agree and consent to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each
party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: February 12, 2018
Dated: February 12, 2018
Christopher P. Burke, Esq.
Greenberg Trauring, LLP
By: /s/ Christopher P. Burke. Esq.
Christopher P. Burke, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 004093
atty@cburke.lvcoxmail.com
218 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-7987
Attorney for Plaintiff
By: /s/ Jacob D. Bundick, Esq.
Jacob D. Bundick, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9772
bundickj@gtlaw.com
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, NV 89169
(702) 792-3773
Attorney for Defendant BANA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
US DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
DATED:
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
February 13, 2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?