Laine v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority

Filing 28

ORDER Denying as Moot 9 and 11 Motions to Dismiss and 12 Motion for More Definite Statement. The motion hearing scheduled for July 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 2:16-cv-01075-JAD-CWH Deborah Laine, 5 Order Denying Motions Plaintiff 6 [ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12] v. 7 Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority, 8 Defendant 9 10 Defendant Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority filed a motion to dismiss or for 11 more definite statement on May 31, 2016.1 Three weeks later, plaintiff filed an amended complaint.2 12 Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits parties to amend their complaints 13 once as a matter of course within 21 days of a motion to dismiss.3 Plaintiff’s amended complaint 14 was timely filed as of right. Once filed, an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading in its 15 entirety, mooting a motion to dismiss the original pleading.4 16 Because the filing of plaintiff’s amended complaint has mooted the Housing Authority’s 17 motion to dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss and 18 Motion for a More Definite Statement [ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12] is DENIED as moot and without 19 prejudice. The hearing scheduled for July 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. 20 Dated this 22nd day of June, 2016. 21 _________________________________ Jennifer A. Dorsey United States District Judge 22 23 24 1 25 26 ECF No. 11, 12. Another version of these documents was first filed at ECF No. 9, but that filing did not comply with LR IC 2-2. 2 ECF No. 27. 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 27 28 4 See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997) (overruled on other grounds in Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012)).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?