Laine v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority
Filing
28
ORDER Denying as Moot 9 and 11 Motions to Dismiss and 12 Motion for More Definite Statement. The motion hearing scheduled for July 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
2:16-cv-01075-JAD-CWH
Deborah Laine,
5
Order Denying Motions
Plaintiff
6
[ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12]
v.
7
Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority,
8
Defendant
9
10
Defendant Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority filed a motion to dismiss or for
11
more definite statement on May 31, 2016.1 Three weeks later, plaintiff filed an amended complaint.2
12
Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits parties to amend their complaints
13
once as a matter of course within 21 days of a motion to dismiss.3 Plaintiff’s amended complaint
14
was timely filed as of right. Once filed, an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading in its
15
entirety, mooting a motion to dismiss the original pleading.4
16
Because the filing of plaintiff’s amended complaint has mooted the Housing Authority’s
17
motion to dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss and
18
Motion for a More Definite Statement [ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12] is DENIED as moot and without
19
prejudice. The hearing scheduled for July 19, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED.
20
Dated this 22nd day of June, 2016.
21
_________________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
22
23
24
1
25
26
ECF No. 11, 12. Another version of these documents was first filed at ECF No. 9, but that filing
did not comply with LR IC 2-2.
2
ECF No. 27.
3
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).
27
28
4
See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997) (overruled on other grounds in
Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012)).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?