Laine v. Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority

Filing 51

ORDER. Based on 50 the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's first, fourth, and six claims for relief are DISMISSED. The only claim remaining his the fifth cause of action alleging a violation of the Equal Pay Act. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01075-JAD-CWH Document 50 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 2 1 Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd. Mary F. Chapman, Esq. 2 Nevada Bar No. 6591 7465 W. Lake Mead Blvd. 3 Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 4 (702)562-1246 phone (702)562-1247 fax 5 maryf.chapman@juno.com Attorney for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 DEBORAH LAINE, THE LAW OFFICE OF MARY F. CHAPMAN, LTD 7465 W. Lake Mead Blvd. Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Ph. (702) 562-1246 Fax (702) 562-1247 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL HOUSING, ) AUTHORITY; DOES 1-10; and ROE ) CORPORATE ENTITIES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) Case No. 2:16-cv-01075 STIPULATION AND ORDER ECF No. 50 Plaintiff, Deborah Laine (hereafter “Plaintiff” or “Laine”) 16 by and through her attorney, the Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, 17 Ltd., and Defendant Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority 18 (hereafter “Defendant” or “SNRHA”) by and through its attorney of 19 record Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. hereby Stipulate and 20 request the Court enter an Order Dismissing the First; Fourth; 21 and Sixth causes of action pursuant to the Plaintiff’s Second 22 Amended Complaint. The only remaining claim will be the Fifth 23 cause of action, Violation of the Equal Pay Act claim. 24 This Stipulation to Dismiss is With Prejudice; and the 25 Parties are to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. This 26 stipulation shall have no force or effect on any pending 27 administrative charge or complaint. 28 / / / Case 2:16-cv-01075-JAD-CWH Document 50 Filed 02/06/17 Page 2 of 2 administrative charge or complaint. 1 Dated this 3rd 2 3 4 5 6 day of February, 2017. Respectfully submitted, Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd. /S/ Mary F. Chapman, Esq. Mary F. Chapman, Esq. 7465 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Maryf.chapman@juno.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 THE LAW OFFICE OF MARY F. CHAPMAN, LTD 7465 W. Lake Mead Blvd. Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Ph. (702) 562-1246 Fax (702) 562-1247 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 /S/ Yadira R. Gibson, Esq. Theodore Parker, III Esq. Yadira R. Gibson, Esq. Parker, Nelson & Associates, Chtd. 2460 Professional Court Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89128 tparker@pnalaw.net Yrios@pnalaw.net Attorneys for Defendant ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation [ECF NO. 50] and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s first, fourth, and six claims for relief are DISMISSED. The only claim remaining his the fifth cause of action alleging a violation of the Equal Pay Act. is the fifth cause of action alleging a violation of the Equal Pay Act. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 2/9/17 _______________________________________ _________________ _ ___ _ __ _ District Court Judge istrict Court Jud t c r 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?