Weinstein v. Meritor, Inc.
ORDER Denying without prejudice 24 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 23 Motion to Dismiss and 22 Motion to Stay, and Reply re 18 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
M. Paul Weinstein,
Order Denying Motion to
Extend Time for Response
ECF No. 24
Plaintiff M. Paul Weinstein moves1 to extend his deadline to respond to defendant’s three
pending motions to March 3, 2017. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires a motion “to state the reasons
for the extension requested.” Weinstein has not provided the reason he needs an extension.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Weinstein’s motion to extend the deadline
for his response to the pending motions [ECF No. 24] is DENIED without prejudice to his
ability to file a new motion (or stipulation if he obtains defendant’s agreement) that states the
reasons he needs the extension. Weinstein is further cautioned that if he files the new motion
after the current due date for any opposition, he must also “demonstrate that the failure to file
the motion before the deadline expired was the result of excusable neglect.” L.R. IA 6-1(a).
DATED: February 7, 2017
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
t Di t i t J d
ECF No. 24.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?