Cebu v. Litton Mortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Respond To the Complaint (Third Request). It is hereby STIPULATED that Ocwen shall have until 10/27/2016 to respond to Ms. Cebus complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
1
2
3
4
5
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz (NSB# 7171)
khintz@mccarthyholthus.com
Thomas N. Beckom, Esq. (NSB# 12554)
tbeckom@mccarthyholthus.com
9510 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Telephone: (702) 685-0329
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
12
13
14
Case No. 2:16-CV-01085-KJD-VCF
ELIZABETH G. CEBU,
11
9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NV 89117
TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
10
Plaintiff,
v.
LITTON MORTGAGE, INC; CITIBANK, N.A.;
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC;
AN
EQUIFAX
INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, LLC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
(Third Request)
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
COMES OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, (hereinafter “OCWEN”) erroneously sued
19
as LITTON MORTGAGE INC on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas
20
N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and ELIZABETH CEBU
21
(“CEBU”) by and through their counsel of record
22
Michael Kind, Esq of the Kazerouni Law
group, APC and hereby file this Stipulation and Order Extending Ocwen’s Time to Respond
23
pursuant to LR 6-1.
24
RECITALS
25
26
27
28
1. On May 13, 2016 Cebu filed a complaint alleging inter alia violations of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act.
1
2. Cebu served Ocwen with this complaint on August 30, 2016 which means that Ocwen’s
answer was due September 19, 2016. From that point Ocwen asked for extension on
2
3
September 16, 2016 as well as October 3, 2016 with the current answer being due on
4
October 17, 2016. As such this stipulation has been filed timely pursuant to LR 6-1.
5
6
3. Ocwen respectfully requests additional time to respond to the complaint.
4. Ocwen has asked for two extension to respond to this complaint.
7
5. Ocwen respectfully request additional time to respond to Ms. Cebu’s complaint as Ocwen
8
and Ms. Cebu are in the process of negotiating a stipulated dismissal of Ocwen.
9
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
6. Specifically Ocwen believes the matter will be settled however Ocwen’s credit team is
11
9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NV 89117
TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
10
attempting to find a legacy access subscriber code as the Defendant in question, Litton
12
Mortgage.
13
wholly purchased by Ocwen in 2011 and Ocwen wishes to quickly and effectively remedy
14
the issue at hand.
15
/…/…/
16
17
18
/…/…/
19
20
/…/…/
21
22
/…/…/
23
24
25
/…/…/
26
27
28
Litton Loan Servicing (named in the complaint as Litton Mortgage) was
/…/…/
1
STIPULATION
2
3
It is hereby STIPULATED that Ocwen shall have until October 27, 2016 to respond to
4
Ms. Cebu’s complaint.
5
DATED this 17th day of October, 2016
DATED this 17th day of October, 2016
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
6
7
8
9
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200
LAS VEGAS, NV 89117
TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
10
12
/s/ Michael Kind, Esq
Thomas N. Beckom, Esq
_/s/
______
Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz, Esq
Nevada Bar No. 7171
Thomas N. Beckom, Esq
Nevada Bar No. 12554
9510 West Sahara Avenue, Suite200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorney for the Ocwen Loan Servicing
Michael Kind, Esq
Nevada Bar No. 13903
7854 West Sahara Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorney for
Elizabeth Cebu
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED
17TH
October
DATED this ____ day of ______________, 2016
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?