Cebu v. Litton Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Respond To the Complaint (Third Request). It is hereby STIPULATED that Ocwen shall have until 10/27/2016 to respond to Ms. Cebus complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz (NSB# 7171) khintz@mccarthyholthus.com Thomas N. Beckom, Esq. (NSB# 12554) tbeckom@mccarthyholthus.com 9510 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Telephone: (702) 685-0329 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12 13 14 Case No. 2:16-CV-01085-KJD-VCF ELIZABETH G. CEBU, 11 9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NV 89117 TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961 McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP 10 Plaintiff, v. LITTON MORTGAGE, INC; CITIBANK, N.A.; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC; AN EQUIFAX INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Third Request) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 COMES OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, (hereinafter “OCWEN”) erroneously sued 19 as LITTON MORTGAGE INC on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas 20 N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and ELIZABETH CEBU 21 (“CEBU”) by and through their counsel of record 22 Michael Kind, Esq of the Kazerouni Law group, APC and hereby file this Stipulation and Order Extending Ocwen’s Time to Respond 23 pursuant to LR 6-1. 24 RECITALS 25 26 27 28 1. On May 13, 2016 Cebu filed a complaint alleging inter alia violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 1 2. Cebu served Ocwen with this complaint on August 30, 2016 which means that Ocwen’s answer was due September 19, 2016. From that point Ocwen asked for extension on 2 3 September 16, 2016 as well as October 3, 2016 with the current answer being due on 4 October 17, 2016. As such this stipulation has been filed timely pursuant to LR 6-1. 5 6 3. Ocwen respectfully requests additional time to respond to the complaint. 4. Ocwen has asked for two extension to respond to this complaint. 7 5. Ocwen respectfully request additional time to respond to Ms. Cebu’s complaint as Ocwen 8 and Ms. Cebu are in the process of negotiating a stipulated dismissal of Ocwen. 9 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6. Specifically Ocwen believes the matter will be settled however Ocwen’s credit team is 11 9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NV 89117 TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961 McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP 10 attempting to find a legacy access subscriber code as the Defendant in question, Litton 12 Mortgage. 13 wholly purchased by Ocwen in 2011 and Ocwen wishes to quickly and effectively remedy 14 the issue at hand. 15 /…/…/ 16 17 18 /…/…/ 19 20 /…/…/ 21 22 /…/…/ 23 24 25 /…/…/ 26 27 28 Litton Loan Servicing (named in the complaint as Litton Mortgage) was /…/…/ 1 STIPULATION 2 3 It is hereby STIPULATED that Ocwen shall have until October 27, 2016 to respond to 4 Ms. Cebu’s complaint. 5 DATED this 17th day of October, 2016 DATED this 17th day of October, 2016 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP 6 7 8 9 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 9510 WEST SAHARA AVENUE, SUITE 200 LAS VEGAS, NV 89117 TELEPHONE (702) 685-0329/Facsimile (866) 339-5961 McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP 10 12 /s/ Michael Kind, Esq Thomas N. Beckom, Esq _/s/ ______ Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz, Esq Nevada Bar No. 7171 Thomas N. Beckom, Esq Nevada Bar No. 12554 9510 West Sahara Avenue, Suite200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorney for the Ocwen Loan Servicing Michael Kind, Esq Nevada Bar No. 13903 7854 West Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorney for Elizabeth Cebu 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED 17TH October DATED this ____ day of ______________, 2016 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?