Ahrens v. Ratliff et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Rashad Ratliff without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6656
sgibson@gibsonlowry.com
JODI DONETTA LOWRY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7798
jlowry@gibsonlowry.com
GIBSON LOWRY LLP
7495 West Azure Drive, Suite 233
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Telephone 702.541.7888
Facsimile 702.541.7899
Attorneys for Plaintiff Edd H. Ahrens
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GIBSON LOWRY LLP
7495 West Azure Drive, Suite 233
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Main (702) 541-7888 • Fax (702) 541-7899
11
EDD H. AHRENS, an individual,
12
13
Case No.: 2:16-cv-1114
Plaintiff,
v.
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AS TO RASHAD RATLIFF AND ORDER
THEREON
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
RASHAD RATLIFF, an individual; PERFECT
PRIVACY, LLC, a limited-liability company;
WEB.COM GROUP, INC., a Delaware
corporation; UPLEA S.A.R.L., a company
organized under French law; DSTORAGE
S.A.S.U., a company organized under French
law; JOHANN THIESSON, an individual; and
YOHAN TORDJMAN, an individual,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Edd H. Ahrens (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel, GIBSON LOWRY LLP,
21
and Defendant Rashad Ratliff (“Mr. Ratliff”), in proper person, hereby move that the Complaint
22
filed by Plaintiff Edd H. Ahrens as to Mr. Ratliff only, shall be dismissed without prejudice,
23
with the respective parties to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees, in accordance with the
24
agreement entered into between Plaintiff and Mr. Ratliff on or about June 14, 2016 (the
25
“Settlement Agreement”).
26
Plaintiff and Mr. Ratliff stipulate that the United States District Court for the District of
27
Nevada shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement in the event that Ratliff
28
breaches this Agreement or defaults on any of Mr. Ratliff’s obligations in any manner, and that
1
1
this Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to the case-in-chief to vacate the Dismissal, allow
2
Ahrens to reinvigorate Ahrens’ claims against Mr. Ratliff as if the Dismissal never occurred, and
3
allow Ahrens to sue Mr. Ratliff for breach and/or default of this Agreement, with Mr. Ratliff
4
hereby waiving any statute of limitations and/or jurisdictional defense of any nature.
5
6
Dated this 13th day of July, 2016.
Dated this 13th day of July, 2016.
GIBSON LOWRY LLP
RASHAD RATLIFF
/s/ J.D. Lowry.
STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6656
JODI DONETTA LOWRY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7798
7495 West Azure Drive, Suite 233
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Attorneys for Plaintiff Edd H. Ahrens
/s/ Rashad Ratliff
Mr. Rashad Ratliff
2636 Oakmere Drive
Harvey, Louisiana 70058
Defendant In Proper Person
7
8
9
10
GIBSON LOWRY LLP
7495 West Azure Drive, Suite 233
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Main (702) 541-7888 • Fax (702) 541-7899
11
12
13
14
15
The parties having so moved, and good cause appearing,
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED:
18
19
20
22
___________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
March 6, 2017
DATED: __________________________
21
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Pursuant to Local Rule 5 of this Court, I certify that I am an employee of GIBSON LOWRY LLP
3
and that on this 13th day of July, 2016, I caused a correct copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO
4
DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO RASHAD RATLIFF AND
5
ORDER THEREON to be served via CM/ECF to:
6
Adam K. Bult, Esq.
abult@bhfs.com
Maximilien D. Fetaz, Esq.
mfetaz@bhfs.com
BROWN HYATT FABER SCHRECK, LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4614
Telephone: (702) 382-2101
Facsimile: (702) 382-8135
Attorneys for Defendants Web.com Group, Inc.
and Perfect Privacy, LLC.
7
8
9
10
GIBSON LOWRY LLP
7495 West Azure Drive, Suite 233
Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Main (702) 541-7888 • Fax (702) 541-7899
11
/s/ David White
An employee of GIBSON LOWRY LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?