Rasavong v. Ruiz et al

Filing 29

ORDER that, pursuant to the Court's screening order (ECF No. 24 ), this action shall proceed on count 1 (excessive force) against Defendant Ruiz; count 2 (retaliation) against Defendant Ruiz; count 4 (state law assault and battery) against De fendant Ruiz; and count 5 (conspiracy) against Defendants Ruiz and Joseph only. FURTHER ORDERED that given the nature of the claim(s) that the Court has permitted to proceed, this action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow Plaintiff and Defe ndant(s) an opportunity to settle their dispute before an answer is filed or the discovery process begins.FURTHER ORDERED that if any party seeks to have this case excluded from the inmate mediation program, that party shall file a "motion to exclude case from mediation" on or before twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order.FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order, the original screening order (ECF No. 24 ) and a copy o f Plaintiff's second amended complaint (ECF No. 25 ) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada.FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General's Office shall advise the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this order whether it will enter a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants for the purpose of settlement.Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 NOUANSAVANH RASAVONG, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 Case No. 2:16-cv-01121-JAD-GWF ORDER v. J. RUIZ et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. DISCUSSION 16 On February 5, 2018, the Court issued a screening order that dismissed some 17 claims with leave to amend and permitted other claims to proceed. (ECF No. 24 at 14- 18 15). The Court granted Plaintiff 30 days from the date of that order to file a third amended 19 complaint curing the deficiencies of his second amended complaint. (Id. at 15). The 20 Court specifically stated that if Plaintiff chose not to file a second amended complaint, the 21 action would proceed on count 1 (excessive force) against Defendant Ruiz; count 2 22 (retaliation) against Defendant Ruiz; count 4 (state law assault and battery) against 23 Defendant Ruiz; and count 5 (conspiracy) against Defendants Ruiz and Joseph only. 24 (Id.). Plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint. Pursuant to the screening order, 25 this action shall proceed on count 1 (excessive force) against Defendant Ruiz; count 2 26 (retaliation) against Defendant Ruiz; count 4 (state law assault and battery) against 27 Defendant Ruiz; and count 5 (conspiracy) against Defendants Ruiz and Joseph only. 28 /// 1 II. CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Court’s screening 3 order (ECF No. 24), this action shall proceed on count 1 (excessive force) against 4 Defendant Ruiz; count 2 (retaliation) against Defendant Ruiz; count 4 (state law assault 5 and battery) against Defendant Ruiz; and count 5 (conspiracy) against Defendants Ruiz 6 and Joseph only. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that given the nature of the claim(s) that the Court has 8 permitted to proceed, this action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow Plaintiff and 9 Defendant(s) an opportunity to settle their dispute before an answer is filed 1 or the 10 discovery process begins. During this ninety-day stay period, no other pleadings or 11 papers shall be filed in this case, and the parties shall not engage in any discovery. The 12 Court will refer this case to the Court’s Inmate Early Mediation Program, and the Court 13 will enter a subsequent order. Regardless, on or before ninety (90) days from the date 14 this order is entered, the Office of the Attorney General shall file the report form attached 15 to this order regarding the results of the 90-day stay, even if a stipulation for dismissal is 16 entered prior to the end of the 90-day stay. If the parties proceed with this action, the 17 Court will then issue an order setting a date for Defendants to file an answer or other 18 response. Following the filing of an answer, the Court will issue a scheduling order setting 19 discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “settlement” may or may not include payment of 21 money damages. It also may or may not include an agreement to resolve Plaintiff’s issues 22 differently. A compromise agreement is one in which neither party is completely satisfied 23 with the result, but both have given something up and both have obtained something in 24 return. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party seeks to have this case excluded from 26 the inmate mediation program, that party shall file a “motion to exclude case from 27 1 28 The Court acknowledges that Defendants filed an answer on March 23, 2018. (ECF No. 27). If Defendants seek to exclude the case from the inmate mediation program in light of their answer, they should file the appropriate motion within the specified time. -2- 1 mediation” on or before twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order. The responding 2 party shall have seven (7) days to file a response. No reply shall be filed. Thereafter, the 3 Court will issue an order, set the matter for hearing, or both. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE 5 a copy of this order, the original screening order (ECF No. 24) and a copy of Plaintiff’s 6 second amended complaint (ECF No. 25) on the Office of the Attorney General of the 7 State of Nevada, by adding the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to the docket 8 sheet. This does not indicate acceptance of service. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General’s Office shall advise the 10 Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this order whether it will enter 11 a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants for the purpose of settlement. No 12 defenses or objections, including lack of service, shall be waived as a result of the filing 13 of the limited notice of appearance. 14 15 DATED THIS 26th day of March 2018. 16 17 United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 NOUANSAVANH RASAVONG, Plaintiff, 11 J. RUIZ et al., Defendants. 14 15 REPORT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: RESULTS OF 90-DAY STAY v. 12 13 Case No. 2:16-cv-01121-JAD-GWF NOTE: ONLY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL FILE THIS FORM. THE INMATE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT FILE THIS FORM. 16 17 On ________________ [the date of the issuance of the screening order], the Court 18 issued its screening order stating that it had conducted its screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915A, and that certain specified claims in this case would proceed. The Court ordered 20 the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to file a report ninety (90) days 21 after the date of the entry of the Court’s screening order to indicate the status of the case 22 at the end of the 90-day stay. By filing this form, the Office of the Attorney General hereby 23 complies. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 REPORT FORM [Identify which of the following two situations (identified in bold type) describes the case, and follow the instructions corresponding to the proper statement.] Situation One: Mediated Case: The case was assigned to mediation by a courtappointed mediator during the 90-day stay. [If this statement is accurate, check ONE of the six statements below and fill in any additional information as required, then proceed to the signature block.] ____ A mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held on _______________ [enter date], and as of this date, the parties have reached a settlement (even if paperwork to memorialize the settlement remains to be completed). (If this box is checked, the parties are on notice that they must SEPARATELY file either a contemporaneous stipulation of dismissal or a motion requesting that the Court continue the stay in the case until a specified date upon which they will file a stipulation of dismissal.) ____ A mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held on ________________ [enter date], and as of this date, the parties have not reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney General therefore informs the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. ____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the 90-day stay, but the parties have nevertheless settled the case. (If this box is checked, the parties are on notice that they must SEPARATELY file a contemporaneous stipulation of dismissal or a motion requesting that the Court continue the stay in this case until a specified date upon which they will file a stipulation of dismissal.) ____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the 90-day stay, but one is currently scheduled for ________________ [enter date]. ____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the 90-day stay, and as of this date, no date certain has been scheduled for such a session. 21 ____ None of the above five statements describes the status of this case. Contemporaneously with the filing of this report, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada is filing a separate document detailing the status of this case. 22 ***** 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 Situation Two: Informal Settlement Discussions Case: The case was NOT assigned to mediation with a court-appointed mediator during the 90-day stay; rather, the parties were encouraged to engage in informal settlement negotiations. [If this statement is accurate, check ONE of the four statements below and fill in any additional information as required, then proceed to the signature block.] ____ The parties engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date, the parties have reached a settlement (even if the paperwork to memorialize the settlement remains to be completed). (If this box is checked, the parties are on notice that they must SEPARATELY file either a contemporaneous stipulation of dismissal or a motion requesting that the Court continue the stay in this case until a specified date upon which they will file a stipulation -5- of dismissal.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ____ The parties engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date, the parties have not reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney General therefore informs the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. ____ The parties have not engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date, the parties have not reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney General therefore informs the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. 8 ____ None of the above three statements fully describes the status of this case. Contemporaneously with the filing of this report, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada is filing a separate document detailing the status of this case. 9 Submitted this _______ day of __________________, ______ by: 7 10 11 12 Attorney Name: _______________________ Print _________________________ Signature Address: Phone: ______________________ 13 14 ___________________________ ______________________ Email: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?