United States of America v. Lipson
Filing
7
ORDER re 3 Motion to Enforce IRS Summons filed by United States of America.the parties are hereby ORDERED to meet-and-confer on the appropriate vehicle through which the instant dispute should be resolved, whether that be through the filing o f a proper memorandum of points and authorities in response to the pending amended petition and a reply, through Defendants filing of a motion to quash or other properly supported motion, or through some other means by which the issues in dispute m ay be fully developed in writing prior to any hearing. The parties are further ORDERED to file a joint proposed schedule for resolving this case, including the briefing identified above, by July 28, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
Pending before the Court is the Government’s amended petition seeking entry of an order
17
requiring Defendant to produce various documents. See Docket No. 3. Defendant has filed an
18
untimely response. Docket No. 6.1 That defense raises approximately sixteen defenses and/or
19
objections to the underlying IRS summons. See id. at 2-4. Those defense and objections are made
20
in entirely conclusory form, devoid of any factual support or legal authority of any kind. See id. To
21
the extent Defendant intends to wait until the order to show cause hearing to elaborate on the factual
22
and legal bases for these defenses and objections, the Court declines to adopt such an approach.
23
Instead, the Court has a strong preference that parties fully brief all factual and legal issues prior to
24
any hearing. See, e.g., Docket No. 2 (denying petition without prejudice because it was unsupported
25
by a memorandum of points and authorities).
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
DAVID E. LIPSON,
14
Defendant(s).
Case No. 2:16-cv-01147-JAD-NJK
ORDER
26
27
28
1
The deadline respond to the petition was July 19, 2016, Docket No. 4 at 2, but the response
was filed on July 21, 2016, see Docket No. 6.
1
Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to meet-and-confer on the appropriate
2
vehicle through which the instant dispute should be resolved, whether that be through the filing of
3
a proper memorandum of points and authorities in response to the pending amended petition and a
4
reply, through Defendant’s filing of a motion to quash or other properly supported motion, or
5
through some other means by which the issues in dispute may be fully developed in writing prior to
6
any hearing. The parties are further ORDERED to file a joint proposed schedule for resolving this
7
case, including the briefing identified above, by July 28, 2016.2
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: July 22, 2016
10
11
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
At this time, the show cause hearing remains calendared for August 22, 2016. In the event
the schedule stipulated to by the parties requires continuance of the hearing as currently scheduled,
that should also be made clear in the stipulation.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?