Meridian OHC Partners, LP v. Cyanotech Corporation et al

Filing 55

ORDER Granting 54 Stipulation to Extend Time to respond to 50 , 52 and 53 Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiff's responses due by 12/9/2016. Defendants replies due by 12/22/2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JAMES D. BOYLE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8384 E-mail:jboyle@nevadafirm.com SEAN E. STORY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13968 E-mail:sstory@nevadafirm.com HOLLEY DRIGGS, WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON 400 South Fourth Street, Third Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702/791-0308 Facsimile: 702/791-1912 7 8 9 10 BRIAN C. BUESCHER, ESQ. (Admitted PHV) PATRICK B. GRIFFIN, ESQ. (Admitted PHV) KUTAK ROCK LLP 1650 Farnam Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Telephone: 402/346-6000 Facsimile: 402/346-1148 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Meridian OHC Partners, LP 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 MERIDIAN OHC PARTNERS, LP, CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01161-JAD-CWH 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 19 CYANOTECH CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; MICHAEL A. DAVIS, an individual; and RUDOLF STEINER FOUNDATION, INC. d/b/a RSF SOCIAL FINANCE, a New York corporation, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT RESPONSES AND REPLIES RELATING TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Request) 20 Defendants. 21 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2, Plaintiff Meridian OHC Partners, LP 22 23 (“Meridian”), and Defendants Cyanotech Corporation (“Cyanotech”), Michael A. Davis (“Davis”) and Rudolf Steiner Foundation, Inc. (“RSF”) (and collectively, “Defendants”), 24 hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Meridian to respond to each of the following 25 Motions to Dismiss filed by the Defendants on November 4, 2016: (1) Cyanotech’s 26 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Derivative Claims (Dkt. No. 50); (2) RSF’s Motion to 27 -111644-01/1787543.doc 1 Dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No. 53); and (3) Davis’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 2 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 52) (collectively the 3 “Motions to Dismiss”). This is the first request for an extension of time for Meridian to 4 file responsive briefs. 5 The current deadline for Meridian to file responsive briefs to the Motions to 6 Dismiss is November 21, 2016. Meridian and the Defendants have stipulated to an 7 eighteen (18) day extension for Meridian to file responsive briefs to the Motions to 8 Dismiss, such that the deadline for filing responsive briefs will be December 9, 2016. 9 The Parties further stipulate and agree that Defendants’ reply briefs in support of the 10 Motions to Dismiss will be due December 22, 2016. 11 Meridian has requested additional time to file its response briefs, given that the 12 Motions to Dismiss raise complex issues and overlapping and intertwined arguments, 13 including joinders filed by one or more Defendants, which require material review and 14 may require Meridian to prepare three separate responsive briefs. 15 respectfully suggests that an eighteen (18) day extension is reasonable and that a good 16 faith position exists for this Court to grant the stipulation of the parties. 17 Dated this 11th day of November, 2016. Dated this 11th day of November, 2016. 18 /s/ James D. Boyle James D. Boyle, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 08384 Sean E. Story, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13968 HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON 400 South Fourth Street, 3rd Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 /s/ I-Che Lai, Esq. I-Che Lai, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12247 WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Brian C. Buescher, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice Patrick B. Griffin, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice KUTAK ROCK LLP 1650 Farnam Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Michael P. McCloskey, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP 655 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101 Attorneys for Defendant Rudolf Steiner Foundation, Inc. d/b/a RSF Social Finance Attorneys for Plaintiff Meridian OHC Partners, LP -211644-01/1787543.doc Thus, Meridian 1 Dated this 11th day of November, 2016. Dated this 11th day of November, 2016. 2 /s/ Dennis L. Kennedy Dennis L. Kennedy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 01462 Sarah E. Harmon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 08106 BAILEY KENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 /s/ Alex L. Fugazzi Alex L. Fugazzi, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 09022 V.R. Bohman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13075 SNELL & WILMER LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 James G. Kreissman, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice Stephen P. Blake, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice SIMPSON THATCHER & BARTLETT LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304 Timothy P. Crudo, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice Lynsdsey M. Marcelino, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice COBLENZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94104-5500 Attorneys for Defendant Cyanotech Corporation Attorneys for Defendant Michael A. Davis 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 Having reviewed and considered the stipulation of the parties set forth above, and 16 good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Meridian OHC Partners, LP 17 shall have by and through December 9, 2016 to file responsive briefs to each of the 18 above-referenced Motions to Dismiss and joinders thereto, and Defendants have until 19 December 22, 2016 to file reply briefs in response thereto. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 DATED: 11/14/2016 26 27 -311644-01/1787543.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?