Mago v. Chase Bank, National Association et al
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Ana-Maria G. Mago
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
Ana-Maria G. Mago,
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
14
15
16
17
CHASE BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; CIT BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC;
WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICE;
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC; TRANS UNION,
LLC,
Defendants.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01174-GMN-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC ONLY
19
Plaintiff Ana-Maria G. Mago and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
20
21
22
23
24
hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with
…
…
…
…
25
26
Page 1 of 2
27
28
1
prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to,
2
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. Each party shall bear its own attorney's
3
fees, prejudgment interest, and costs of suit.
Dated:
4
August 11, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
/s/David H. Krieger, Esq.
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
By:
/s/ Eric W. Swanis, Esq.
Eric W. Swanis, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 400N
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorney for Defendant Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED
18
19
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
September 1, 2016
DATED: ____________________
22
23
24
25
26
Page 2 of 2
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?