Duda v. Neven et al
Filing
9
ORDER that Petitioner's 8 Motion to Submit Additional Claims is Denied without prejudice. Petitioner has 60 days from entry of this order to file a motion for leave to amend the petition accompanied by the proposed amended petition. Respon dents' deadline for responding to the originalpetition is extended 120 days from entry of this order. The deadline will be automatically vacated if Petitioner timely files a motion for leave to amend. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - 2 copies of 2254 form/1 set of 2254 instructions, and 4 mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
CHESTER DUDA,
Petitioner,
9
10
2:16-cv-01176-JCM-CWH
ORDER
vs.
11
12
13
D. NEVEN, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
16
This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the court on petitioner’s
motion (ECF No. 8) to submit additional claims.
17
The motion will be denied without prejudice. In order to seek to present additional
18
claims, petitioner must file a motion for leave to file an amended petition that is accompanied
19
by the proposed amended petition. The court will allow petitioner an opportunity to do so
20
within the time allowed by this order, and the court will extend respondents’ current response
21
deadline accordingly. All claims, old and new, must be presented in any such proposed
22
amended petition. Piecemeal pleadings are not permitted.
23
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 8) to submit
24
additional claims is DENIED without prejudice to the presentation of a proper motion for leave
25
to amend filed within the time period allowed by this order.
26
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have sixty (60) days from entry of this
27
order within which to mail to the clerk for filing a motion for leave to amend the petition
28
accompanied by the proposed amended petition.
1
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents’ deadline for responding to the original
2
petition is extended to one hundred twenty (120) days from entry of this order, but said
3
deadline will be automatically vacated without the necessity of a further court order if
4
petitioner timely dispatches a motion for leave to amend, with the deadline then to be reset
5
by the court following a ruling on the motion.
6
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall use the court’s required Section 2254
7
petition form for any proposed amended petition presented and that he shall clearly title the
8
proposed amended petition as an amended petition by placing the word "AMENDED"
9
immediately above "Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus" on page 1 in the caption and shall
10
place the docket number, 2:16-cv-01176-JCM-CWH, above the word "AMENDED." Under
11
local rule LR 15-1, the proposed amended petition must be complete in itself without
12
reference to previously filed papers. Thus, the claims and allegations that are stated in the
13
proposed amended petition will be the only matters remaining before the court if leave to
14
amend is granted. Any claims or allegations that are omitted from the proposed amended
15
petition and that are not re-alleged therein no longer will be before the court if leave to amend
16
is granted.
17
The clerk of court shall SEND petitioner: (a) two copies of a noncapital Section 2254
18
petition form with one copy of the instructions for the form; and (b) one copy of the original
19
petition with attached papers (i.e., ECF No. 4) that he submitted.
20
DATED: November 22, 2016.
21
22
23
24
_________________________________
JAMES C. MAHAN
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?