Eltizam v. City of Las Vegas et al
Filing
17
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than 1/19/17, Plaintiff must initiate a scheduling conference in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Rule 26-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
NICK ELTIZAM,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
v.
THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
8
Defendant.
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01178-APG-CWH
ORDER
_______________________________________
10
The parties in this matter have not filed a discovery plan, or notified the Court of any issues
11
regarding discovery. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) requires that parties must confer as soon
12
as is practicable in order to prepare a discovery plan and scheduling order. Under Local Rule
13
26-1(a), the plaintiff must initiate scheduling of the 26(f) conference within 30 days after the first
14
defendant answers or otherwise appears. Here, Defendant answered on August 23, 2016 (ECF No.
15
8).
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than January 19, 2017, Plaintiff must initiate a
17
scheduling conference in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Rule
18
26-1.
19
20
DATED: December 19, 2016.
21
22
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?