Allstate Insurance Company v. Kia Motors America, Inc.

Filing 27

ORDER approving ECF No. 26 Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the Central District of CA. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/15/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01221-MMD-NJK Document 26 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 Berna L. Rhodes-Ford (Bar #7879) Rhodes-Ford & Associates, P.C. 8485 W. Sunset Road, Suite 106 Las Vegas, NV 89113 (702) 684 - 6262 berna@rhodesford.com 7 Garret A. Leach, P.C., pro hac vice KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862 - 2000 gleach@kirkland.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 6 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Insurance Company, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, and KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-01221-MMD-NJK JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:16-cv-01221-MMD-NJK Document 26 Filed 08/12/16 Page 2 of 4 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, the Parties hereby file this Stipulation to Transfer 2 Venue to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff 3 Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Insurance Company (“Allstate”), and Defendants 4 Kia Motors America, Inc., a California Corporation, and Kia Motors Corporation, a 5 foreign corporation (collectively, the “Defendants”), by and through their respective 6 counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 7 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2016, Allstate filed its Complaint in this District. There is 8 no dispute between the parties that venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 9 §1391. 10 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Transfer Venue to the Central District of 11 California, together with a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, 12 on August 1, 2016; 13 14 WHEREAS, Allstate currently must respond to Defendants’ Motion on or before August 15, 2016; 15 WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in positive negotiations on the issue of 16 transfer and have reached agreement that the case should be transferred to the Central 17 District of California; 18 WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial efficiency, and with a desire to not overly 19 burden the courts or the Parties with extensive briefings and/or hearings on this issue, 20 Allstate has agreed to stipulate to Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue to the Central 21 District of California; 22 WHEREAS, as part of this Stipulation, Defendants have agreed to not move to 23 dismiss defendant Kia Motors Corporation on the grounds that the Central District of 24 California lacks personal jurisdiction during the course of this action; 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, transfer of this matter is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1404, which provides: For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where 2 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:16-cv-01221-MMD-NJK Document 26 Filed 08/12/16 Page 3 of 4 1 2 it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented. 3 WHEREAS, as thoroughly discussed by Defendants in the Memorandum of Points 4 and Authorities in support of their Motion to Transfer Venue, this action could have been 5 brought in the Central District of California; 6 7 8 9 10 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Allstate and Defendants agree and hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, to: Transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California and request that this action be transferred accordingly. Dated: August 12, 2016 11 Berna L. Rhodes-Ford (Nevada Bar Number 7879) Rhodes-Ford & Associates, P.C. 8485 W. Sunset Road, Suite 106 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Telephone: (702) 684-6262 berna@rhodesford.com 12 13 14 15 Garret A. Leach, P.C. ,pro hac vice KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862 - 2000 gleach@kirkland.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Berna L. Rhodes-Ford Dated: August 12, 2016 /s/ D. Lee Roberts Jr. D. Lee Roberts Jr. (Nevada Bar Number 8877) Timothy A. Mott (Nevada Bar Number 12828) Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins Gunn & Dial, LLC 6385 South Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Telephone: (702) 938-3809 Facsimile: (702) 938-3864 24 25 26 27 28 Kevin J. Minnick, pro hac vice Lance A. Etcheverry, pro hac vice Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 300 S Grand Avenue Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3144 213-687 5000 3 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:16-cv-01221-MMD-NJK Document 26 Filed 08/12/16 Page 4 of 4 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and the action is ordered transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California to be reassigned to a judge in the Central 6 7 District for all purposes. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 __________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 15 Dated: August ___, 2016. 13 14 Submitted by: 15 /s/ Berna L. Rhodes-Ford____________________ Berna L. Rhodes-Ford (Nevada Bar Number 7879) Rhodes-Ford & Associates, P.C. 8485 W. Sunset Road, Suite 106 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Telephone: (702) 684-6262 berna@rhodesford.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Garret A. Leach, P.C., pro hac vice KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862 - 2000 gleach@kirkland.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?