Dryden v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 150

ORDER Re: 137 Motion for Summary Judgment, 134 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies to 134 due 14 days from date of this order. Responses to 137 due 30 days from date of this order. Replies to 137 14 days from filing Opposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Document 150 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 BRYAN DRYDEN, 5 6 7 Case No. 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Plaintiff, ORDER v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 On May 1, 2020, this Court granted Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time in which 11 to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and ordered the parties to file a joint status 12 report advising the Court whether Plaintiff has reviewed his medical records. ECF No. 143. The 13 Court stated it would set a date by which the parties are required to respond to the opposing party’s 14 Motion for Summary Judgment after the joint status report has been filed. Id. at 1:24–25. 15 On May 8, 2020, Defendants filed a Notice of Compliance advising the Court that Plaintiff 16 had conducted his review of his medical file and selected one page to be submitted to the Court. 17 ECF No. 149 at 2:14–15. 18 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: • 20 21 Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 137); • 22 23 24 25 Defendants shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the filing of Defendant’s Opposition to file a Reply in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment; and, • Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file a Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 134). DATED THIS 12th day of May, 2020. 26 27 28 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?