Dryden v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
197
ORDER Granting 196 Sixth Stipulation to extend discovery deadlines set in Order (ECF No. 190 ) for 90 days. Discovery due by 11/8/2022. Motions due by 12/8/2022. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/9/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 7/13/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF)
Case 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Document 197 Filed 07/13/22 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
Justin V. Alper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12923C
3535 Executive Terminal Dr # 300
Henderson, NV 89052
Phone: (702) 361-2100
Email: jalper.law@gmail.com
Pro Bono Attorney for Plaintiff
Bryan Dryden
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
BRYAN DRYDEN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DISCOVERY
[SIXTH REQUEST]
v.
STATE OF NEVADA ET AL.,
15
Defendant
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Bryan Dryden by and through his pro bono counsel, Justin V. Alper, and
Defendant Ted Nielson by and through his counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General of
21
the State of Nevada, and Austin T. Barnum, Senior Deputy Attorney General, agree and have
22
23
stipulated to extend discovery and other deadlines in this case for general purposes. The previous
24
deadlines were set in ECF No. 190. The parties agree that more time is needed to review
25
documents, conduct depositions, written questions and that there may be records and perhaps
26
additional evidence that still need to be obtained through discovery.
27
28
1
Case 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Document 197 Filed 07/13/22 Page 2 of 4
1
The attorneys met and conferred on July 8, 2022 whereby they agreed to a general
2
extension of discovery by 90 days. The issue of reactivating the deadline for experts was
3
proposed by Plaintiff’s counsel, Justin V. Alper. However, the defense does not agree to
4
5
reactivate the deadline for expert witnesses at this time because the defense is already conducting
6
an investigation into the suspicious/tampered document in this case (the nurse’s Unusual
7
Occurrence Report), and because the defense feels that a forgery expert is unnecessary, and
8
finally the defense expressed concerns that reactivating the deadline for experts could confuse
9
the jury and cause the trier of fact to believe that the case is about a document instead of an
10
11
assault. However, Plaintiff does not agree with such arguments.
12
13
14
Nonetheless, the parties have stipulated to extend all deadlines (except the issue of
experts) by approximately 90 days as outlined with the dates indicated directly below:
15
16
17
In particular, the proposed new deadlines would be as follows:
18
19
1. Discovery to remain open until November 8, 2022.
20
21
3. Dispositive Motions due December 8, 2022.
22
4. Pretrial Order due January 9, 2023.*
23
24
25
5. FRCP 26(a)(3) Disclosures and any objections thereto to be included in the
final pre-trial order.
26
27
28
2
Case 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Document 197 Filed 07/13/22 Page 3 of 4
1
2
6. The depositions of Glenn Fowler and James Murdock shall be completed,
provided that their deposition dates have been adjusted by mutual agreement of the parties for
3
convenience purposes.
4
*Unless a dispositive motion is pending on that date, then this deadline shall
5
6
automatically extend the due date for the pre-trial order to 30 days after the pending dispositive
7
motion is resolved.
8
9
Therefore, the parties stipulate and request that this Court grant an extension of
10
11
approximately 90 days for general discovery matters with the proposed dates as indicated above.
12
13
14
Certificate of Meet and Confer Completed
15
The attorneys in this case, Justin V. Alper and Austin T. Barnum conducted a meet-and-
16
confer on July 8, 2022 and agreed to extend the discovery deadline for general discovery, but
17
could not agree on the issue of reactivating the deadline for use of experts. Various points were
18
19
discussed for about 40 minutes as indicate above. The parties came to an agreement on the
20
stipulation to extend general discovery deadlines.
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
3
Case 2:16-cv-01227-JAD-EJY Document 197 Filed 07/13/22 Page 4 of 4
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
4
5
Dated this 12th day of July, 2022
6
7
By: /s/ Justin V. Alper_____________
8
Justin V. Alper (Bar No. 12923C)
9
Attorney for Plaintiff Bryan Dryden
10
11
12
13
14
By: /s/ Austin T. Barnum_____________
Austin T. Barnum (Bar No. 15174)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendant Ted Nielson
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
Dated: July 13, 2022
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?