Freestream Aircraft (Bermuda) Limited et al v. Aero Law Group et al

Filing 79

ORDER The court will disburse to plaintiffs their respective $500.00 security bonds plus interest. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Finance - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 FREESTREAM AIRCRAFT (BERMUDA) LIMITED and ALIREZA ITTIHADIEH, ORDER Plaintiff(s), 9 v. 10 11 AERO LAW GROUP and JOHN SCHMIDT, Defendant(s). 12 13 14 Presently before the court is the matter of Freestream Aircraft (Bermuda) Limited et al. v. Aero Law Group et al., case number 2:16-cv-1236-JCM-NJK. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Case No. 2:16-CV-1236 JCM (NJK) On June 3, 2016, plaintiffs Freestream Aircraft (Bermuda) Limited and Alireza Ittihadieh (collectively “plaintiffs”) initiated this action against defendants Aero Law Group (“Aero”) and John Schmidt. (ECF No. 1). On June 27, 2016, the court ordered plaintiffs to post security for costs in the amount of $500.00 in favor of Aero pursuant to NRS 18.130. (ECF No. 13). On June 28, the court ordered plaintiffs to post security for costs in the amount of $500.00 in favor of Schmidt pursuant to NRS 18.130. (ECF No. 15). On that same day, plaintiffs deposited $1,000.00 with the court. (ECF Nos. 18, 22). ... ... ... ... ... ... 1 On April 5, 2019, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. (ECF No. 78). On April 2 19, 2019, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. Id. As this 3 matter is now concluded, the court will disburse to plaintiffs their respective $500.00 security 4 bonds plus interest. 5 Accordingly, 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED April 25, 2019. 8 9 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?