First American Title Insurance Company v. Allen-Cook et al
Filing
32
ORDER re 30 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement. The court needs additional information to evaluate the proposed settlement. Defendants J. Scott MacDonald and MacDonald & Associates, Ltd. must file an additional brief by 3/23/2017. Upon receipt of the brief the court will set a good faith settlement hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LORI ALLEN-COOK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01272-GMN-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the court is Defendants J. Scott MacDonald and MacDonald & Associates,
14
Ltd.’s (“M&A”) Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement with Request for Expedited
15
Hearing/Order Shortening Time (ECF No. 30), filed on February 27, 2017. This matter was
16
referred to the undersigned by the United States district judge assigned to the case for the purpose
17
of holding a hearing and filing proposed findings and recommendations regarding the good-faith
18
settlement determination.
19
The court has reviewed and considered M&A’s motion and finds that it needs additional
20
information to evaluate the proposed settlement. By March 23, 2017, M&A must file an additional
21
brief that contains the following items:
22
•
A more detailed factual discussion of the underlying dispute and the parties’ roles;
23
•
A list of the claims that were resolved through the mediation with Judge Jackie
24
Glass (Ret.);
25
•
A list of the remaining claims and parties;
26
•
A status update regarding Defendant Allen-Cook’s bankruptcy case;
27
•
A detailed discussion of the settlement and its terms, including the amount of the
28
settlement and the parties to the settlement; and
1
•
A more detailed discussion of the facts supporting each of the good-faith settlement
2
determination factors, including M&A’s insurance policy limits and its financial
3
condition.
4
The court finds that there is good cause under Rule 5.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil
5
Procedure to require redaction of confidential information regarding the settlement from the brief.
6
To preserve the settlement’s confidentiality, M&A must file one copy of the brief under seal
7
without redaction as well as a redacted version of the brief for the public record. Finally, M&A
8
must attach a proposed order including findings and recommendations in compliance with the
9
procedures set forth in Local Rule 7-2(f). Upon receipt of the brief, the court will set a good-faith-
10
11
settlement hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
DATED: March 9, 2017
14
15
16
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?