Centex Homes v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
Filing
33
ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation re 19 First MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint. ( Replies due by 11/28/2016.) Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 3
1 ANDREW D. HEROLD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7378
2 aherold@heroldsagerlaw.com
JOSHUA A. ZLOTLOW, ESQ.
3
Nevada Bar No. 11333
4 jzlotlow@heroldsagerlaw.com
HEROLD & SAGER
5 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
6 Tel: (702) 990-3624
Fax: (702) 990-3835
7
8 Attorneys for Defendant
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEV ADA
12
13
CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general
partnership,
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL
STIPULATION RE BRIEFING ON
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S
MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST
REQUEST]
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation;
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation; FINANCIAL
PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a
California corporation; HARTFORD
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an
Indiana corporation,
22
Defendants.
23
24
Plaintiff CENTEX HOMES ("Centex") and Defendant LEXINGTON INSURANCE
25
COMPANY ("Lexington"), hereby submit the following Stipulation Re Briefing on Lexington's
26 Motion to Dismiss.
27
///
28
///
1
STIPULATION RE BRIEFING ON LEXINGTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL
Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 3
1
2
WHEREAS, Lexington filed a Motion to Dismiss on October 10, 2016 (ECF Nos. 19 and
20) (the "Motion");
WHEREAS, the Motion makes vanous arguments as to why Centex's claims against
3
4 Lexington should be dismissed relying in part on the language of the Lexington policies at issue;
WHEREAS, the Motion did not include copies of the Lexington policies themselves, but
5
6 rather correspondence between Lexington and Centex in which the parties disputed Centex' s rights
7 and Lexington's obligations under the policies based in part of the policy language;
8
WHEREAS, Centex and Lexington previously stipulated that Lexington would supplement
9 the Motion with copies of the insurance policies addressed therein and Centex's opposition would
10
filed and served within 10 calendar days of the filing of Lexington's supplemental papers and
11 Lexington's reply papers would be filed and served within 10 calendar days thereafter.
12
WHEREAS, Lexington filed copies of the policies on November 4, 2016 and Centex filed
13 its opposition on November 14, 2016.
WHEREAS, November 24, 2016 is Thanksgiving, counsel's offices are closed on
14
15 November 25, 2016, and counsel for Lexington will be out of the country at that time.
NOW, THEREFORE, Centex and Lexington, by and through their respective counsel of
16
17 record, hereby stipulate that Lexington shall file and serve its reply by November 28, 2016.
18 DATED: November 17, 2016
19
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
By:
20
21
22
23
Ill
24
Isl Sarah J Odia (as authorized 11117116)
SCOTT S. THOMAS, ESQ.
sst@paynefears.com
SARAH J. ODIA, ESQ.
sjo@paynefears.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff CENTEX HOMES
Ill
25 Ill
26
Ill
27 Ill
28 Ill
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL
Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 3 of 3
1 DATED: November 17, 2016
By:J~~HEROLD, ESQ.
,~NDR
D.
2
3
l aherold@heroldsagerlaw.com
JOSHUA A. ZLOTLOW, ESQ.
jzlotlow@heroldsagerlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
4
5
6
7
HEROLD & SAGER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
8 DATED: November 27, 2016
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?