Centex Homes v. Everest National Insurance Company et al

Filing 33

ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation re 19 First MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint. ( Replies due by 11/28/2016.) Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 3 1 ANDREW D. HEROLD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7378 2 aherold@heroldsagerlaw.com JOSHUA A. ZLOTLOW, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 11333 4 jzlotlow@heroldsagerlaw.com HEROLD & SAGER 5 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 6 Tel: (702) 990-3624 Fax: (702) 990-3835 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEV ADA 12 13 CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general partnership, Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL STIPULATION RE BRIEFING ON LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; FINANCIAL PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation; HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, 22 Defendants. 23 24 Plaintiff CENTEX HOMES ("Centex") and Defendant LEXINGTON INSURANCE 25 COMPANY ("Lexington"), hereby submit the following Stipulation Re Briefing on Lexington's 26 Motion to Dismiss. 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIPULATION RE BRIEFING ON LEXINGTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 3 1 2 WHEREAS, Lexington filed a Motion to Dismiss on October 10, 2016 (ECF Nos. 19 and 20) (the "Motion"); WHEREAS, the Motion makes vanous arguments as to why Centex's claims against 3 4 Lexington should be dismissed relying in part on the language of the Lexington policies at issue; WHEREAS, the Motion did not include copies of the Lexington policies themselves, but 5 6 rather correspondence between Lexington and Centex in which the parties disputed Centex' s rights 7 and Lexington's obligations under the policies based in part of the policy language; 8 WHEREAS, Centex and Lexington previously stipulated that Lexington would supplement 9 the Motion with copies of the insurance policies addressed therein and Centex's opposition would 10 filed and served within 10 calendar days of the filing of Lexington's supplemental papers and 11 Lexington's reply papers would be filed and served within 10 calendar days thereafter. 12 WHEREAS, Lexington filed copies of the policies on November 4, 2016 and Centex filed 13 its opposition on November 14, 2016. WHEREAS, November 24, 2016 is Thanksgiving, counsel's offices are closed on 14 15 November 25, 2016, and counsel for Lexington will be out of the country at that time. NOW, THEREFORE, Centex and Lexington, by and through their respective counsel of 16 17 record, hereby stipulate that Lexington shall file and serve its reply by November 28, 2016. 18 DATED: November 17, 2016 19 PAYNE & FEARS LLP By: 20 21 22 23 Ill 24 Isl Sarah J Odia (as authorized 11117116) SCOTT S. THOMAS, ESQ. sst@paynefears.com SARAH J. ODIA, ESQ. sjo@paynefears.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CENTEX HOMES Ill 25 Ill 26 Ill 27 Ill 28 Ill 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Case 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL Document 31 Filed 11/17/16 Page 3 of 3 1 DATED: November 17, 2016 By:J~~HEROLD, ESQ. ,~NDR D. 2 3 l aherold@heroldsagerlaw.com JOSHUA A. ZLOTLOW, ESQ. jzlotlow@heroldsagerlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY 4 5 6 7 HEROLD & SAGER IT IS SO ORDERED: 8 DATED: November 27, 2016 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01275-GMN-PAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?