Centex Homes v. Zurich Specialties London Limited et al
Filing
65
ORDER that the clerk shall close this case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
***
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CENTEX HOMES,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01278-JCM-GWF
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ZURICH SPECIALTIES LONDON
LIMIITED, et al.,
Defendants.
Presently before the court is the matter of Centex Homes v. Zurich Specialties London
Limited et al., case number 2:16-cv-01278-JCM-GWF.
On June 8, 2016, plaintiff Centex Homes (“Centex”) initiated this action against
18
defendants Zurich Specialties London Limited (“Zurich London”); Assurance Company of
19
America (“Assurance”); Northern Insurance Company of New York (“Northern”); St. Paul Fire
20
and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”); and Unionamerica Insurance Company Limited
21
(“Unionamerica”), as successor in interest to St. Paul Reinsurance Company Limited
22
(“Reinsurance”) (collectively “defendants”). (ECF No. 1).
23
On January 30, 2017, the court dismissed with prejudice all claims against Zurich
24
London. (ECF No. 36). On September 27, 2017, the court dismissed with prejudice all claims
25
against St. Paul. (ECF No. 55). On December 29, 2017, the court dismissed with prejudice all
26
claims against Unionamerica and Reinsurance. (ECF Nos. 57, 64). On January 4, 2018, Centex
27
voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims Assurance and Northern. (ECF Nos. 58, 59).
28
The court has dismissed with prejudice all claims in this action. Centex Homes has also
1
filed a notice informing the court “that the instant action has been completely resolved.” (ECF
2
No. 64). As there are no further issues to resolve, the court will close the case.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
The clerk shall close the case.
5
DATED THIS 15th day of April 2019.
6
7
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?