Harris v. Williams et al
Filing
9
ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Extend Time. Amended Petition for writ of habeas corpus deadline: 12/26/2016. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in order 7 entered 7/13/16 will remain in effect. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/24/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
BRANDON KALE HARRIS,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,
2:16-cv-01305-JAD-CWH
13
14
Respondents.
ORDER
ECF # 8
_________________________________/
15
16
17
In this habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Brandon Kale Harris, was due to file an amended
habeas petition by October 12, 2016. See Order entered July 13, 2016 (ECF No. 7).
18
On October 11, 2016, Harris filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 8), requesting a
19
75-day extension, to December 26, 2016, for his amended petition. Harris’s counsel states that the
20
extension of time is necessary to investigate this case, meet with the petitioner, and draft an amended
21
petition. Respondents do not oppose the motion for extension of time. The Court finds that Harris’s
22
motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that
23
there is good cause for the extension of time Harris requests.
24
///
25
///
26
///
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No 8)
2
is GRANTED. Petitioner will have until and including December 26, 2016, to file an amended
3
petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set
4
forth in the order entered July 13, 2016 (ECF No. 7) will remain in effect.
5
Dated this 24th day of October, 2016.
6
7
D ST E DISTRICT JUDGE
TAT
T C
UNITED ST TES DISTRICT J
STATES
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?