Coleman v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 10/16/17 Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA
BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-4 MORTGAGE)
BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2004-4; et al.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-01339-RFB-GWF
This matter is before the Court on Defendant American Home Mortgage Investment Trust
2004-4 Mortgage Backed Notes failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR
7.1-1. Defendant’s Answer (ECF No. 35) in this matter was filed September 5, 2017. LR 7.1-1
requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must, upon entering a
case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations,
known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the names of all
parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there are no known
interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed.
To date, __Plaintiffs have failed to comply. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Certificate as to Interested Parties, which
fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than October 16, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
DATED this 10th day of October, 2017.
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?