Davidson v. Nevens et al

Filing 5

ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set forth in this order. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find the court's dismissal of this improperly commenced action wi thout prejudice to be debatable or incorrect. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of the papers that he submitted in this action. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 LEE DAVIDSON, 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-01356-JCM-GWF Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 DWIGHT NEVENS, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 On October 13, 2006, the court denied habeas corpus petitioner Lee Davidson’s 15 application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed him to pay the $5.00 filing fee within 16 thirty (30) days. More than the allotted time has passed, and Davidson has failed to pay 17 the filing fee or respond to the court’s order in any manner. Thus, the present action will 18 be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order to pay the filing 19 fee. 20 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set forth in this order. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists 23 of reason would not find the court’s dismissal of this improperly commenced action 24 without prejudice to be debatable or incorrect. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of the papers that he submitted in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. 5 6 7 December 13, 2016. DATED: 12 December 2016. 8 9 JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?