Bank of America, N.A. v. Tierra De Las Palmas Owners Association et al

Filing 62

ORDER accepting and modifying 56 Report and Recommendation; The clerk of court is instructed to strike defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC's answer (ECF No. 7) and to enter default against defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01362-APG-NJK Document 62 Filed 07/17/20 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 4 5 v. Plaintiff Case No.: 2:16-cv-01362-APG-NJK Order (1) Accepting and Modifying Report and Recommendation and (2) Directing Entry of Default Against Defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC 6 TIERRA DE LAS PALMAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., [ECF No. 56] 7 Defendants 8 On June 26, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I enter default judgment 9 against defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC because it has failed to comply with orders 10 to retain counsel to defend itself in this action. ECF No. 56. Absolute did not file an objection. 11 Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 12 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions 13 of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. 14 Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 16 otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 However, I modify Judge Koppe’s recommendation to direct entry of default against 18 Absolute, rather than enter default judgment. Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. seeks damages 19 against Absolute and thus far I have no basis to enter a judgment in any amount against 20 Absolute. Indeed, the homeowners association has moved for summary judgment on Bank of 21 America’s claims against it, which are the same as Bank of America’s claims against Absolute, 22 arguing that Bank of America cannot succeed on its claims. See ECF No. 53. Moreover, the 23 deadline for Bank of America to seek summary judgment against Absolute has expired without Case 2:16-cv-01362-APG-NJK Document 62 Filed 07/17/20 Page 2 of 2 1 the Bank having filed a dispositive motion seeking that relief. In sum, entry of default judgment 2 is premature. Consequently, I will direct the clerk of court to strike Absolute’s answer (ECF No. 3 7) and enter default. 4 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 5 (ECF No. 56) is accepted and modified as follows: The clerk of court is instructed to strike 6 defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC’s answer (ECF No. 7) and to enter default against 7 defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC. 8 DATED this 17th day of July, 2020. 9 10 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?