Gardener v. City of Las Vegas
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant City of Las Vegas without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-01384-GMN-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 1056
ELIAS P. GEORGE
Deputy City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 12379
egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov
495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 229-6629 (office)
(702) 386-1749 (fax)
Attorneys for City of Las Vegas
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER GARDNER, individually, and
as heir, and Special Administrator for THE
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-01384-GMN-CWH
ESTATE OF ELLEN FINNIE GALLUCCI,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
vs.
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, a corporate City of the PREJUDICE
State of Nevada; LAS VEGAS
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT,
political subdivision of the State of Nevada;
SHERIFF JOSEPH LOMBARDO,
Defendants.
18
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Christopher
19
Gardner, individually, and as heir and special administrator for the estate of Ellen Finnie
20
Gallucci, by and through his attorney Amy M. Wilson, Esq., of the The Law Offices of Kevin R.
21
Hansen, and defendant City of Las Vegas, by and through its attorneys, Bradford R. Jerbic, City
22
Attorney, by Elias P. George, Deputy City Attorney, and representing that no trial has been set,
23
hereby stipulate to dismissal without prejudice defendant City of Las Vegas from the instant suit.
24
On September 20, 2016 plaintiff filed suit in the above-captioned matter asserting various
25
42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims and accompanying state-law tort claims. [ECF No. 7]. The complaint
26
asserts allegations against defendants’ City of Las Vegas, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police
27
Department (“Metro”), and Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Sheriff”) for events relating solely to the
28
of
City of Las Vegas
495 S. Main Street
Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 229-6629
1 of 2
Case 2:16-cv-01384-GMN-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 2
1
actions (or inactions) of defendants Metro and Sheriff. [ECF No. 7]. Under governing law,
2
however, the City of Las Vegas is not responsible for the actions of Metro or its employees,
3
including the Sheriff, for Metro is an independent governmental entity formed under NRS
4
280.010, et seq. Pursuant to this statutory authority, Clark County and the City merged their
5
police agencies into a single entity, NRS 280.110, which merger consolidated the law
6
enforcement powers of the City and County into a wholly separate and distinct entity, Metro,
7
NRS 280.120, for which the Sheriff is its chief law enforcement officer. NRS 280.121.
8
9
10
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that defendant City of Las Vegas,
including plaintiff’s allegations lodged against the city, is hereby dismissed without prejudice
from the instant action, with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.
11
12
DATED: October 19, 2016
DATED: October 19, 2016
13
/S/ Elias P. George
_________________________
ELIAS P. GEORGE
Deputy City Attorney
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
Nevada Bar No. 12379
495 South Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
egeorge@lasvegasnevada.gov
Attorneys for City of Las Vegas
/S/ Amy M. Wilson
_____________________________
AMY M. WILSON, ESQ.
THE LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN R. HANSEN
Nevada Bar No. 13421
5440 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 206
Las Vegas, NV 89146
amy@kevinrhansen.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DATED this ___ day of October, 2016.
1
27
28
of
City of Las Vegas
495 S. Main Street
Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 229-6629
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?