Prentice v. Barrett et al
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file their stipulation to dismiss or, in the alternative, a status report regarding the execution of settlement documents no later than 8/11/2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why this case should not be returned to the litigation track or dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
ANTHONY PRENTICE,
8
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
10
REGINA BARRETT et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
___________________________________
2:16-cv-01390-APG-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to comply with the Court’s order instructing
the parties to file a stipulation to dismiss no later than July 24, 2017.
15
On May 26, 2017, the parties participated in an early mediation conference and reached a
16
settlement. See ECF No. 19. On June 26, 2017, Defendants requested a four week extension of the stay
17
as well as an additional four weeks to file settlement documents. ECF No. 22. On June 28, 2017, the
18
Court granted Defendants’ request and instructed the parties to file a stipulation to dismiss no later than
19
July 24, 2017. ECF No. 23. To date, the parties have failed to comply. Accordingly,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file their stipulation to dismiss or, in the
21
alternative, a status report regarding the execution of settlement documents no later than August 11,
22
2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why this case should not
23
be returned to the litigation track or dismissed for want of prosecution.
24
DATED this 2nd day of August, 2017.
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?