Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hemp, Inc. et al

Filing 197

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT HOBBES EQUITIES INC. AND ORDER CLOSING CASE. ORDER granting 192 Stipulated/Consent Judgment. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/31/2021. Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Document 192-1 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Casey R. Fronk (Illinois #6296535) admitted pro hac vice fronkc@sec.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission Salt Lake Regional Office 351 South West Temple, Suite 6.100 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 524-5796 Facsimile: (801) 524-3558 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Plaintiff, vs. HEMP, INC. a Colorado Corporation; BRUCE J. PERLOWIN, an individual; BARRY K. EPLING, an individual; JED M. PERLOWIN, an individual; FERRIS HOLDING, INC., a private Nevada Corporation; HOBBES EQUITIES INC., a private Nevada Corporation; DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LLC, a private Nevada Limited Liability Company; and QUANTUM ECONOMIC PROTOCOLS LLC, a private Nevada Limited Liability Company. 20 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT HOBBES EQUITIES INC. & ORDER CLOSING CASE ECF No. 192 Defendants. 21 22 23 1. The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and 24 Defendant HOBBES EQUITIES INC. having entered a general appearance; consented to the 25 Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of 26 this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to 27 28 1 Case 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Document 192-1 Filed 05/28/21 Page 2 of 5 1 2 jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph IV); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: 3 I. 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 6 permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the 7 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 8 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of 9 10 11 interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: 12 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 13 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact 14 necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances 15 under which they were made, not misleading; or 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 23 officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 24 participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 25 26 27 28 II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 2 Case 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Document 192-1 Filed 05/28/21 Page 3 of 5 1 2 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the 3 4 mails, directly or indirectly: 5 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 6 (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact 7 or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements 8 made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; 9 or 10 11 (c) would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 12 13 14 to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 15 16 receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 17 officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 18 participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 19 III. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 23 24 25 § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any 26 means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce 27 or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus 28 or otherwise; 3 Case 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Document 192-1 Filed 05/28/21 Page 4 of 5 1 (b) 2 Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or 3 instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for 4 delivery after sale; or 5 6 7 8 (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration 9 10 statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the 11 registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the 12 effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination 13 under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in 15 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who 17 receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s 18 officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or 19 participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). 20 IV. 21 22 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant 23 is permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny stock, including engaging in 24 activities with a broker, dealer, or issuer for purposes of issuing, trading, or inducing or 25 attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any penny stock. A penny stock is any equity 26 27 28 security that has a price of less than five dollars, except as provided in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act [17 C.F.R. 240.3a51-1]. 4 Case 2:16-cv-01413-JAD-BNW Document 192-1 Filed 05/28/21 Page 5 of 5 1 2 V. 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VI. 6 7 8 As the filing of this Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of pending, IT IS There being no just reason for delay,leaves no parties or claims the Federal Rules of Civil FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk this Final directed to CLOSE and without further notice. Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enterof Court is Judgment forthwith THIS CASE. 9 10 _________________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey Dated: May 31, 2021 11 12 13 14 Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ JENNIFER A. DORSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?