Norman v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
Filing
12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED M&A shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 11/22/16. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
PAUL W. NORMAN,
7
8
9
10
11
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01493-APG-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
et al.,
Defendants.
12
This matter is before the court on Defendant Michael & Associates’ (“M&A”) failure to
13
file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in
14
this matter was filed June 23, 2016. M&A filed its Answer (ECF No. 8) October 3, 2016. LR 7.1-
15
1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for
16
private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R.
17
Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including
18
parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-
19
1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating in the
20
case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly
21
file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To
22
date, M&A has failed to comply. Accordingly,
23
IT IS ORDERED M&A shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies
24
with LR 7.1-1 no later than November 22, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of
25
an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
26
DATED this 8th day of November, 2016.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?