Vilela et al v. Valley Health System LLC et al

Filing 23

ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation re 12 MOTION to Dismiss . The due date for the Opposition is retroactively extended to 10/4/16. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CASEY D. GISH, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6657 THE LAW OFFICE OF CASEY D. GISH 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89118 Phone: (702) 583-5883 Fax: (702) 447-6845 Email: info@gishlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 THE LAW OFFICE OF CASEY D. GISH 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Phone (702) 583-5883 10 11 AMY VILELA, an individual; JOZETTE FIGUEREDO, an individual; AMY VILELA, as Special Administrator of the Estate of SHALYNNE RAMOS, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01503 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DUE DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TANYA NETZ’ MOTION TO DISMISS vs. FIRST REQUEST VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, d/b/a CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation; VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a Nevada Corporation; EMCARE, INC., a Deleware Corporation; Tanya Netz PAC; Jill Mcatee, RN; DOE Defendants I through X, inclusive; ROE NURSES I through XX, inclusive; ZOE HOSPITALS or OTHER MEDICAL FACILITIES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive. Defendants. 24 25 Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, Casey D. Gish, Esq. of The Law Office 26 of Casey D. Gish and Defendant, TANYA NETZ, PAC, by and through her attorney of record, 27 Todd Weiss, Esq. of John H. Cotton and Associates, hereby stipulate as follows: 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 (1) The due date for Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant NETZ’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 12) was October 3, 2016. (2) The parties agree that the due date for the Opposition should be extended to October 4, 2016. (3) Counsel for Plaintiffs moved his office location beginning September 28, 2016. The move continued through October 1, 2016. 7 (4) Counsel for Plaintiff has had intermittent computer problems while getting his new 8 office location set-up. These problems resulted in the inability of Plaintiffs’ Counsel 9 to file Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant NETZ’s Motion to Dismiss until 5:37 a.m. THE LAW OFFICE OF CASEY D. GISH 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Phone (702) 583-5883 10 11 on October 4, 2016, which was 5 hours and 37 minutes late. (5) Counsel for Defendant NETZ has no objection to the filing being 5 hours and 37 12 minutes late. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated this 4th Day of October, 2016 Dated this 4th Day of October, 2016 /s/ Casey D. Gish ____________________________________ CASEY D. GISH, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6657 THE LAW OFFICE OF CASEY D. GISH 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89118 Phone: (702) 583-5883 Fax: (702) 447-6845 Email: info@gishlawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiffs /s/ Todd Weiss ____________________________________ TODD WEISS, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14130 JOHN H. COTTON AND ASSOCIATES 7900 West Sahara Ave., #200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Phone: 702-832-5909 Fax: 702-832-5910 Email: TWeiss@jhcottonlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Tanya Netz, PAC 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER 26 Pursuant to the terms of the attached stipulation, the Court orders as follows: 27 1. Good cause exists for the retroactive extension of the due date for Plaintiffs’ 28 Opposition to Defendant NETZ’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 12). 2 1 2. The due date for the Opposition is retroactively extended to October 4, 2016. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 __________________________ ________________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICTII United States District Judge October 10, 2016. DATED: _________________________ 7 8 9 THE LAW OFFICE OF CASEY D. GISH 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Phone (702) 583-5883 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?