Ferguson v. Baker et al

Filing 170

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that, by 3/18/2022, plaintiff Christopher Ferguson shall file one of the following: a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a proposed pretrial order under Local Rules 16-3(b) and 16-4, a motion for entry of clerks default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), or a proposed alternate plan for resolution of his remaining claims against Fast Tow, Inc. Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of the remaining claims. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/28/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01525-APG-NJK Document 170 Filed 02/28/22 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 CHRISTOPHER EDWARD FERGUSON, 4 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01525-APG-NJK Order Plaintiff 5 v. 6 CHAD BAKER, et al., 7 8 Defendants The only remaining claims in this case are plaintiff Christopher Ferguson’s claims against 9 defendant Fast Tow, Inc. More than 30 days have passed since the Ninth Circuit denied 10 Ferguson’s petition for writ of mandamus. ECF No. 169. Consequently, I order Ferguson to 11 indicate how he intends to proceed as to his remaining claims. 12 I THEREFORE ORDER that, by March 18, 2022, plaintiff Christopher Ferguson shall 13 file one of the following: a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14 41(a)(1), a proposed pretrial order under Local Rules 16-3(b) and 16-4, a motion for entry of 15 clerk’s default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), or a proposed alternate plan for 16 resolution of his remaining claims against Fast Tow, Inc. Failure to respond to this order will 17 result in dismissal of the remaining claims. 18 DATED this 28th day of February, 2021. 19 20 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?