Martinez v. Baker et al
Filing
36
ORDER that 32 Motion to Extend the Deadline to Effectuate Service and for Service by Publication is GRANTED. The deadline to serve Mr. Sasser by publication is extended by 60 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
ROBERT C. MARTINEZ,
9
Plaintiff(s),
10
v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Defendant(s).
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01546-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 32)
14
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time to serve Joshua C.
15
Sasser and for leave to serve him by publication. Docket No. 32. No response has been filed. The
16
motions are properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed below,
17
the motions are GRANTED.
18
I.
Motion to Extend Time for Service
19
Where good cause is shown, the time for serving the complaint is extended for an appropriate
20
period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The motion establishes sufficient cause to extend the time for
21
effectuating service on Mr. Sasser by 60 days from the issuance of this order.
22
II.
Motion for Leave to Serve by Publication
23
Plaintiff seeks leave to serve Mr. Sasser by publication. Service by publication implicates a
24
defendant’s fundamental due process rights. See, e.g., Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.,
25
339 U.S. 306, 314-15 (1950); Price v. Dunn, 787 P.2d 785, 787 (Nev. 1990). As a result, service by
26
publication is generally disfavored. See, e.g., Trustees of the Nev. Resort Assoc.–Int’l Alliance of
27
Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Machine Operators v. Alumifax, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist.
28
Lexis. 106456, *2 (D. Nev. July 29, 2013).
1
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for service pursuant to the law of the state in which
2
the district court is located, or in which service is made. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Pursuant to
3
Rule 4 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, parties are generally required to personally serve
4
summons and the complaint upon defendants. Nevada law also permits a party to obtain leave for
5
service by publication when the opposing party, inter alia “cannot, after due diligence be found within
6
the state, or by concealment seeks to avoid the service of summons.” Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). There are
7
several factors courts consider to evaluate a party’s due diligence, including the number of attempts
8
made to serve the defendant at his residence and other methods of locating defendants, such as
9
consulting public directories and family members. See Price, 787 P.2d at 786-87; Abreu v. Gilmer, 985
10
P.2d 746, 747 (Nev. 1999); McNair v. Rivera, 874 P.2d 1240, 1241 (Nev. 1994).
11
In this case, Plaintiff attempted has tracked Defendant’s residence and attempted to serve him
12
on several occasions at several locations. See Docket No. 32 at 5-10. Plaintiff has also engaged in other
13
methods of attempting to locate Mr. Sasser, including attempting to reach him telephonically and
14
checking public records. See id. To date, all such efforts have been fruitless. The Court finds these
15
efforts sufficient to establish diligence, and permits service by publication.
16
III.
Conclusion
17
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motions to extend the deadline to effectuate service and
18
for service by publication. The deadline to serve Mr. Sasser by publication is extended by 60 days.
19
Plaintiff shall comply with the requirements of Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and shall:
20
(a)
21
22
of Nevada on a weekly basis for a period of four weeks.
(b)
23
24
Serve Mr. Sasser by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the State
Serve Mr. Sasser by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the
Commonwealth of Virginia on a weekly basis for a period of four weeks.
(c)
After publication is complete, Plaintiff shall file an Affidavit of Publication.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: December 9, 2016
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?