Hulbert v. Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DEBORAH HULBERT, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) AINSWORTH GAME TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-01552-GMN-CWH ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), filed by Defendants 11 Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., Mike Dreitzer, John Glaser, and Lisa Nappi (collectively 12 “Defendants”). After Defendants filed the motion, Plaintiff Deborah Hulbert properly filed an 13 amended complaint. (ECF No. 8). “[A]n amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter 14 being treated thereafter as non-existent.” Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 15 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Here, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pertains to the original complaint 16 rather than the operative amended complaint. 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), is 19 DENIED as moot. 20 21 27 DATED this _____ day of February, 2017. 22 23 24 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge 25 Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?