Hulbert v. Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., et al
ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
AINSWORTH GAME TECHNOLOGY, INC., )
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01552-GMN-CWH
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), filed by Defendants
Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., Mike Dreitzer, John Glaser, and Lisa Nappi (collectively
“Defendants”). After Defendants filed the motion, Plaintiff Deborah Hulbert properly filed an
amended complaint. (ECF No. 8). “[A]n amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter
being treated thereafter as non-existent.” Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002,
1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Here, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pertains to the original complaint
rather than the operative amended complaint.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), is
DENIED as moot.
DATED this _____ day of February, 2017.
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?