Hulbert v. Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

DEBORAH HULBERT,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
AINSWORTH GAME TECHNOLOGY, INC., )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 2:16-cv-01552-GMN-CWH
ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), filed by Defendants

11

Ainsworth Game Technology, Inc., Mike Dreitzer, John Glaser, and Lisa Nappi (collectively

12

“Defendants”). After Defendants filed the motion, Plaintiff Deborah Hulbert properly filed an

13

amended complaint. (ECF No. 8). “[A]n amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter

14

being treated thereafter as non-existent.” Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002,

15

1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Here, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pertains to the original complaint

16

rather than the operative amended complaint.

17

Accordingly,

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 4), is

19

DENIED as moot.

20
21

27
DATED this _____ day of February, 2017.

22
23
24

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge

25

Page 1 of 1