Quick v. Clark County et al

Filing 10

ORDER Denying without prejudice the parties' 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a new proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the local rules no later than 10/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/11/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
MICHAEL QUICK,
7
Plaintiff(s),
8
vs.
9
10
11

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ex rel. LAS
VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
et al.,

12

Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-01554-RFB-NJK
ORDER

13
14

Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

15

Docket No. 9. The parties request special scheduling review, but do not explain why longer time

16

periods should apply to the case. See Local Rule 26-1(a).

17

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties’ proposed discovery plan and

18

scheduling order, Docket No. 9, without prejudice. The parties shall file a new proposed

19

discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the local rules no later than October 14,

20

2016.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED: October 11, 2016

23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge