Quick v. Clark County et al
ORDER Denying without prejudice the parties' 9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a new proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the local rules no later than 10/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/11/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ex rel. LAS
VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
Case No. 2:16-cv-01554-RFB-NJK
Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.
Docket No. 9. The parties request special scheduling review, but do not explain why longer time
periods should apply to the case. See Local Rule 26-1(a).
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties’ proposed discovery plan and
scheduling order, Docket No. 9, without prejudice. The parties shall file a new proposed
discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the local rules no later than October 14,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 11, 2016
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?