Bank of America, N.A. v. BTK Properties LLC, et al.
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 41 Stipulation re 36 , 37 , 38 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment . ( Responses due by 7/24/2017.) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-01558-JCM-PAL Document 44 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Edgar C. Smith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5506
Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10115
alancaster@wrightlegal.net
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV, 89117
(702) 475-7967; Fax: (702) 946-1345
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01558
Plaintiff,
vs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE
12
13
14
15
16
17
BTK PROPERTIES LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company; TERRA WEST
COLLECTIONS GROUP LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; LA PALOMA
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada
non-profit corporation; and DOES I through X,
and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X,
inclusive,
18
19
20
21
22
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (“BOFA”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment
against BTK Properties LLC ECF No. 36 on June 19, 2017, Defendant BTK Properties, LLC
(“BTK”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 38 on June 19, 2017, and Defendant
23
La Paloma Homeowners Association’s (“La Paloma”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment
24
ECF No. 37 on June 19, 2017 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of
25
record, stipulate as follows:
26
27
1.
The Parties agree to extend the deadline for BTK Properties to file an opposition
to BOFA’s Motion for Summary Judgment to July 24, 2017.
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-01558-JCM-PAL Document 44 Filed 07/10/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2.
The Parties further agree to extend the deadline for BOFA to file an opposition to
La Paloma’s Motion for Summary Judgment to July 24, 2017.
3.
The Parties further agree to extend the deadline for BOFA to file an opposition to
BTK’s Motion for Summary Judgment to July 24, 2017.
4.
The Parties further agree to extend the deadline for La Paloma to file an
opposition to the Motion’s for Summary Judgment to July 24, 2017.
4.
This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time to file oppositions to the
above set forth Motions for Summary Judgment.
9
5.
The Parties’ request for this extension is not intended to cause any delay or
10
11
12
prejudice to any party. Rather, this brief extension will accommodate the schedule of counsel
and their conflicts with the current deadline.
13
14
DATED: JULY 7, 2017
DATED: JULY 7, 2017
15
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK
AYON LAW, PLLC
By: /s/ Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Aaron D Lancaster, Esq.
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
By:_/s/ Luis A. Ayon, Esq.
_________
Luis A. Ayon, Esq.
9205 West Russell Road
Building 3, Suite 240
Las Vegas, NV 89148
Attorneys for Defendant BTK Properties
LLC
16
17
18
19
20
DATED: JULY 7, 2017
21
LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER &
GARIN, P.C.
22
23
24
25
26
27
/s/ Julie A. Funai, Esq.________
Kaleb D. Anderson, Esq.
Julie A. Funai, Esq.
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorney for Defendant La Paloma
Homeowners Association
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-01558-JCM-PAL Document 44 Filed 07/10/17 Page 3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Defendant BTK Properties, LLC has up through and until July 24, 2017 to file an
5
opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Further, Plaintiff Bank of America,
6
N.A. has up through and until July 24, 2017 to file an opposition to BTK Properties, LLC and La
7
Paloma Homeowners Association’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
8
July 13, 2017.
Dated this ___ day of ____________, 2017.
9
10
_________________________________________
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?