Hunt/Penta et al v. Aon Risk Services South, Inc.

Filing 53

ORDER Granting 52 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines re 49 Motion to Dismiss. ( Responses due by 3/3/2017., Replies due by 4/7/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:16-cv-01563-JAD-NJK Document 52 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

WILLIAM P. VOLK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 006157
E. DANIEL KIDD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 010106
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
400 South Rampart Boulevard
Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, Aon Risk Services
South, Inc.

9

400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: [phone] / FAX: [phone]

KOLESAR & LEATHAM

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12

***

13
14

HUNT/PENTA, a Joint-Venture of HUNT
CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., and PENTA
BUILDING GROUP, LLC,

15

Plaintiffs,

16
17
18

vs.
AON RISK SERVICES SOUTH, INC. and
Does 1-50, inclusive,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO
MOTION TO DIMSISS AON’S
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
(First Request)

Defendants.

19
20

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01563-JAD-NJK

ORDER

AON RISK SERVICES SOUTH, INC.
Third-Party Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

INSURANCE PARTNERS, INC.

23

Third-Party Defendant.

24
25

Third-Party Defendant, INSURANCE PARTNERS, INC. (“Insurance Partners”) and

26

Third-Party Plaintiff, AON RISK SERVICES SOUTH, INC. (“Aon”), by and through their

27

undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to the respond to Insurance

28

Partners’ Motion to Dismiss Aon’s Third Party Complaint filed on February 3, 2017 as follows:
2315124 (7500-8)

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:16-cv-01563-JAD-NJK Document 52 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 2

1

1. Insurance Partners filed a Motion to Dismiss Aon’s Third Party Complaint

2
3

(“Motion to Dismiss”) on February 3, 2017. See ECF No. 49.
2. The deadline to respond to the Motion to Dismiss is currently set for February 17,

4
5

2017.
3. A hearing regarding the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for April 17, 2017. See

6

ECF No. 50.

counsel has requested a two week extension on the deadline to respond to the

9

Motion to Dismiss. The parties’ counsel hereby stipulate and agree to extend the

10
400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
TEL: [phone] / FAX: [phone]

4. Due to upcoming deadlines in other matters and other scheduling conflicts, Aon’s

8

KOLESAR & LEATHAM

7

deadline to respond to the Motion to Dismiss by two weeks to March 3, 2017.

11

The parties further stipulate and agree to extend the reply deadline to April 7,

12

2017.

13

5. This stipulation is made in good faith pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and there is good

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

cause for the Court to enter the extension requested.
DATED: February 13, 2017

DATED: February 13, 2017

BRISCOE LAW GROUP
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN LLP

KOLESAR & LEATHAM
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

s/Shemilly Briscoe
____________________________________
Shemilly Briscoe (Nevada Bar No. 9985)
Clark Theil (Nevada Bar No. 10778)
Michael S. McNamara (Pro Hac Vice)
Brandon C. Clark (Pro Hac Vice)
Counsel for Hunt/PENTA Joint Venture of Hunt
Construction Group, Inc., Penta Building Group,
LLC, and Third-Party Defendant Insurance
Partners, Inc.

s/E. Daniel Kidd
_______________________________________
Scott R. Cook (Nevada Bar No. 5265)
William P. Volk (Nevada Bar No. 6157)
E. Daniel Kidd (Nevada Bar No. 10106)
Jena L. Levin (Pro Hac Vice)
Patrick J. McMahon (Pro Hac Vice)
Counsel for Defendant Aon Risk Services
South, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED:
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: ______________________________
Dated: February 13, 2017.

27
28
2315124 (7500-8)

Page 2 of 2