Hunt/Penta et al v. Aon Risk Services South, Inc.
Filing
72
ORDER Denying 62 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
HUNT/PENTA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
AON RISK SERVICES SOUTH, INC.,
14
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01563-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 62)
15
16
Pending before the Court is Third-Party Plaintiff’s (“Aon”) motion to compel discovery
17
responses from Third-Party Defendant Insurance Partners, Inc. (“IPI”). Docket No. 62. IPI filed a
18
response. Docket No. 66. IPI also filed a supplement to its response with the Court’s permission.
19
Docket Nos. 68, 69. Aon filed a reply. Docket No. 70. The Court finds this motion properly
20
resolved without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-1.
21
Aon filed its motion to compel while IPI’s motion to dismiss its third-party complaint was
22
pending. See Docket Nos. 49 (motion to dismiss), 62 (motion to compel). In the motion, Aon
23
submits that IPI’s objections to providing the discovery at issue rest primarily on the pendency of
24
its motion to dismiss. See Docket No. 62 at 6-12. After IPI filed its response, however, United
25
States District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey granted IPI’s motion to dismiss and therefore dismissed
26
Aon’s third-party complaint with leave to amend. Docket No. 67. IPI submits in the supplement
27
to its response that Judge Dorsey’s decision moots Aon’s motion to compel. Docket No. 68 at 3.
28
In reply, Aon submits that Judge Dorsey’s resolution of IPI’s motion to dismiss does not moot the
1
2
3
motion to compel. Docket No. 70 at 6-7.
The Court agrees with IPI. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot Aon’s motion to
compel. Docket No. 62.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: May 3, 2017.
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?