Stratton et al v. Webb et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation to Extend Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 9/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01565-JAD-GWF Document 15 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 4 17 09/09/16 1 2 3 4 5 John E. Bragonje Nevada Bar No. 9519 Jonathan W. Fountain Nevada Bar No. 10351 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.949.8200 jbragonje@lrrc.com jfountain@lrrc.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Harlan Stratton and Plaintiff O.E.M. Trailers, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 Case No. 2:16-cv-01565-JAD-GWF HARLAN STRATTON, an individual; O.E.M. Trailers, LLC. an Arizona limited liability company, inclusive, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 16 VINCE WEBB, an individual; TRAILERS INTL, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; RNO EXHIBITIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, inclusive, 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF HARLAN STRATTON TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TRAILERS INTL LLC’S COUNTERCLAIM AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES’ PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER Defendants. 15 (First Request) 18 TRAILERS INTL LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 19 Counterclaimant, 20 vs. 21 HARLAN STRATTON, an individual, 22 Counterdefendant. 23 24 Plaintiff Harlan Stratton and Plaintiff O.E.M. Trailers, LLC (together “Plaintiffs”) on the 25 one hand, and Defendants Vince Webb, Trailer Intl LLC, and RNO Exhibitions, LLC (together, 26 “Defendants”), on the other hand, state the following: 27 1. The Complaint in this action was filed on July 1, 2016. (See ECF No. 1.) 28 2. After obtaining an extension of time from Mr. Stratton, Defendant Trailers Intl LLC -1- Case 2:16-cv-01565-JAD-GWF Document 15 Filed 09/08/16 Page 2 of 4 17 09/09/16 1 served its Answer and Counterclaim on August 16, 2016. (See ECF Nos. 8, 9, 12.) 2 3 3. Mr. Stratton’s answer or other response to the Counterclaim is presently due on September 9, 2016. 4 4. The parties’ principals are presently engaged in settlement discussions. 5 5. To facilitate settlement discussions, and not for the purpose of creating any 6 unnecessary delay in these proceedings, the parties agree to extend the deadline for Mr. Stratton to 7 serve his Answer to the Counterclaim by thirty (30) days, from September 9, 2016 to October 9, 8 2016. 9 6. In addition, pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties have thirty (30) days “after the first 10 defendant answers or otherwise appears” to conduct a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) discovery planning 11 conference, and fourteen days thereafter to submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. 12 Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2). The Defendants appeared on August 16, 2016 when they filed their 13 answers. (See ECF Nos. 10-12.) Under the federal and local rules, the parties have until September 14 15, 2016 to conduct a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference and until September 29, 2016 to 15 file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. 16 7. To further facilitate settlement discussions, and not for the purpose of creating any 17 unnecessary delay in these proceedings, the parties agree to extend the present deadline for 18 conducting a Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference by thirty (30) days, from September 15, 19 2016 to October 15, 2016, and extend the deadline for submission of a Rule 26(f) report and 20 proposed discovery plan and scheduling order by thirty (30) days, from September 29, 2016 to 21 October 31, 2016. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. By: /s/ Jonathan W. Fountain John E. Bragonje Nevada Bar No. 9519 Jonathan W. Fountain Nevada Bar No. 10351 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.949.8200 By: /s/ Leslie Bryan Hart Leslie Bryan Hart Nevada Bar No. 4932 A. J. Hames Nevada Bar No. 13498 300 E. Second St., Suite 1510 Reno, Nevada 89501 -2- Case 2:16-cv-01565-JAD-GWF Document 15 Filed 09/08/16 Page 3 of 4 17 09/09/16 1 jbragonje@lrrc.com jfountain@lrrc.com 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Harlan Stratton and Plaintiff O.E.M. Trailers, LLC Telephone: 775.788.2228 lhart@fclaw.com ahames@fclaw.com JONCUS LAW LLC Steve Joncus, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice Application to be Submitted) P.O. Box 838 Clackamas, OR 97015 Telephone: 971.236.1200 steve@joncus.net Attorneys for Defendants Vince Webb and RNO Exhibitions, LLC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Trailers Intl LLC 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 DATED: September 12, 2016 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- Case 2:16-cv-01565-JAD-GWF Document 15 Filed 09/08/16 Page 4 of 4 17 09/09/16 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on September 8, 2016, I caused a true and accurate copy of the 3 foregoing document entitled, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR 4 PLAINTIFF HARLAN STRATTON TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO 5 DEFENDANT TRAILERS INTL LLC’S COUNTERCLAIM AND TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR 6 SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES’ PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING 7 ORDER (First Request), to be filed with the Clerk of the Court via the Court’s CM/ECF system, 8 which will send/sent an electronic copy of the same to the following counsel of record: 9 Leslie Bryan Hart A. J. Hames FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 300 E. Second St., Suite 1510 Reno, Nevada 89501 lhart@fclaw.com ahames@fclaw.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JONCUS LAW LLC Steve Joncus P.O. Box 838 Clackamas, OR 97015 steve@joncus.net 18 Attorneys for Defendants Vince Webb and RNO Exhibitions, LLC and Defendant and Counterclaimant Trailers Intl LLC 19 Dated: this 8th day of September, 2016. 17 20 21 /s/ Jonathan W. Fountain An employee of Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?