Ponder v. Drivetime Automotive Group, Inc.
Filing
6
ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than 11/16/16, either (1) a joint proposed discovery plan; or (2) a status report explaining why a proposed discovery plan should not be filed at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
MARGO PONDER,
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
DRIVETIME AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01573-JCM-NJK
ORDER
13
To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-
14
1(a). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than November 16, 2016, either (1) a joint
15
proposed discovery plan; or (2) a status report explaining why a proposed discovery plan should not
16
be filed at this time.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
DATED: November 10, 2016
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?