Curtis v. Federal Bureau of Investigations

Filing 12

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 11 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Plaintiff Thomas Curtis W.'s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff and is instructed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Plaintiff - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

THOMAS CURTIS W.,

10
11
12
13
14

Case No. 2:16-cv-01586-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER

v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATIONS,
Defendant.

15
16
17

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 11] of the
Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered June 21, 2017.

18

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

19

recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific

20

written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §

21

636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is

22

required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed

23

findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local

24

Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct

25

“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

26

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due

27

by July 5, 2017. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case

28

and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.

1
2
3
4
5
6

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 11] is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Thomas Curtis W.’s Amended Complaint
(ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff and is
instructed to enter judgment accordingly

7
8

DATED: August 9, 2017.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-