Curtis v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
Filing
12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 11 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Plaintiff Thomas Curtis W.'s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff and is instructed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Plaintiff - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
THOMAS CURTIS W.,
10
11
12
13
14
Case No. 2:16-cv-01586-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATIONS,
Defendant.
15
16
17
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 11] of the
Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered June 21, 2017.
18
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
19
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
20
written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
21
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
22
required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
23
findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
24
Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
25
“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
26
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
27
by July 5, 2017. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case
28
and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 11] is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Thomas Curtis W.’s Amended Complaint
(ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff and is
instructed to enter judgment accordingly
7
8
DATED: August 9, 2017.
_____________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?