Bank of America N.A. v. BTK Properties LLC et al
Filing
77
ORDER Granting 76 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 72 , 73 , 74 Motions for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 11/6/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Edgar C. Smith, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5506
Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10115
alancaster@wrightlegal.net
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV, 89117
(702) 475-7967; Fax: (702) 946-1345
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01600-JCM-VCF
vs.
CASCADE RESEARCH PARTNERS, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company; VIEW OF
BLACK MOUNTAIN HOMEONWERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit company;
RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company; and DOES
I through X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINES FOR
OPPOSITION TO THE PARTIES’
RESPECTIVE MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”),
through its counsel of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq. and Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq., Cascade
Research Partners, LLC (“Cascade”), through its counsel of record, Michael N. Beede, Esq.,
View of Black Mountain Homeowners Association (“HOA”), through its counsel of record
24
Amber M. Williams, Esq., and Red Rock Financial Services, LLC, through its counsel of record
25
26
27
28
David R. Koch, Esq. and Steven B. Scow, Esq. respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order to
extend the opposition due dates for each of the parties’ respective motions for summary
judgment.
Page 1 of 3
1
In accordance with the Order [ECF No. 60], Dispositive Motions were to be due by
2
October 2, 2017. BANA, Cascade and HOA each timely filed their motion for summary
3
judgment on October 2, 2017, with the opposition due dates set for October 23, 2017. Good
4
cause exists for this extension because counsel for BANA has recently experienced significant
5
computer system problems in its office that has hampered its ability to prepare oppositions to
6
7
8
both HOA’s and Cascade’s motions for summary judgment. Consequently, the parties have
conversed and have agreed to an extension on all oppositions to each of the outstanding motions
for summary judgment filed by BANA, Cascade and HOA, such that all oppositions to the
9
motions for summary judgment will now be due November 6, 2017.
10
11
12
13
This is the parties’ first request for extension and is not meant for the purposes of delay
or prejudice to any party.
Dated this 19th day of October, 2017.
14
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK
THE LAW OFFICE OF MIKE BEEDE, PLLC
15
By: /s/ Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq.
Aaron D Lancaster, Esq.
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
By: /s/ Michael N. Beede, Esq.
Michael N. Beede, Esq.
2470 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 201
Las Vegas, NV 89074
Attorneys for Defendant Cascade Research
Partners, LLC
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER &
GARIN, P.C.
KOCH & SCOW LLC
/s/ Amber M. Williams, Esq.
Amber M. Williams, Esq.
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorney for Defendant View of Black
Mountain Homeowners Association
By: /s/ Steven B. Scow, Esq.
David R. Koch, Esq.
Steven B. Scow, Esq.
Brody R. Wright, Esq.
11500 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 210
Henderson, NV 89052
Attorneys for Red Rock Financial Services,
LLC
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
Case No.: 2:16-cv-01600-JCM-VCF
1
2
ORDER
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this ___ day of ____________, 2017.
October 23 2017.
_________________________________________
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?