Bank of America N.A. v. BTK Properties LLC et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 76 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 72 , 73 , 74 Motions for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 11/6/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Edgar C. Smith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5506 Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10115 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV, 89117 (702) 475-7967; Fax: (702) 946-1345 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01600-JCM-VCF vs. CASCADE RESEARCH PARTNERS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; VIEW OF BLACK MOUNTAIN HOMEONWERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit company; RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES I through X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION TO THE PARTIES’ RESPECTIVE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), through its counsel of record, Edgar C. Smith, Esq. and Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq., Cascade Research Partners, LLC (“Cascade”), through its counsel of record, Michael N. Beede, Esq., View of Black Mountain Homeowners Association (“HOA”), through its counsel of record 24 Amber M. Williams, Esq., and Red Rock Financial Services, LLC, through its counsel of record 25 26 27 28 David R. Koch, Esq. and Steven B. Scow, Esq. respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order to extend the opposition due dates for each of the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment. Page 1 of 3 1 In accordance with the Order [ECF No. 60], Dispositive Motions were to be due by 2 October 2, 2017. BANA, Cascade and HOA each timely filed their motion for summary 3 judgment on October 2, 2017, with the opposition due dates set for October 23, 2017. Good 4 cause exists for this extension because counsel for BANA has recently experienced significant 5 computer system problems in its office that has hampered its ability to prepare oppositions to 6 7 8 both HOA’s and Cascade’s motions for summary judgment. Consequently, the parties have conversed and have agreed to an extension on all oppositions to each of the outstanding motions for summary judgment filed by BANA, Cascade and HOA, such that all oppositions to the 9 motions for summary judgment will now be due November 6, 2017. 10 11 12 13 This is the parties’ first request for extension and is not meant for the purposes of delay or prejudice to any party. Dated this 19th day of October, 2017. 14 WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK THE LAW OFFICE OF MIKE BEEDE, PLLC 15 By: /s/ Aaron D. Lancaster, Esq. Aaron D Lancaster, Esq. 7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. By: /s/ Michael N. Beede, Esq. Michael N. Beede, Esq. 2470 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 201 Las Vegas, NV 89074 Attorneys for Defendant Cascade Research Partners, LLC 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. KOCH & SCOW LLC /s/ Amber M. Williams, Esq. Amber M. Williams, Esq. 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorney for Defendant View of Black Mountain Homeowners Association By: /s/ Steven B. Scow, Esq. David R. Koch, Esq. Steven B. Scow, Esq. Brody R. Wright, Esq. 11500 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 210 Henderson, NV 89052 Attorneys for Red Rock Financial Services, LLC 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 Case No.: 2:16-cv-01600-JCM-VCF 1 2 ORDER 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this ___ day of ____________, 2017. October 23 2017. _________________________________________ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?