Collegium Fund Series 32 v. Snyder et al

Filing 62

ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 57 Motion (First Request). Responses due by 9/1/2017. Replies due by 9/29/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM Tara Clark Newberry, Esq. (SBN: 10696) tnewberry@cnlawlv.com 7854 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89117 Telephone: (702) 608-4232 Facsimile: (702) 946-1380 Attorney for Collegium Fund LLC Series 32 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 COLLEGIUM FUND SERIES 32, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, 10 Plaintiff, 11 13 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone (702) 608-4232 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM vs. 12 14 15 MARK DANIEL SNYDER, an individual; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 10, Defendants, 16 17 18 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national banking association, and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 19 Counter-Claimants, 20 21 22 23 24 25 vs. COLLEGIUM FUND SERIES 32, a Nevada limited-liability company; ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; NUEVO VISTA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Nevada non-profit cooperative corporation; 26 Counter-Defendant. 27 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 28 1 CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-01640-JCM-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES 32 TO RESPOND TO FREDDIE MAC AND WELLS FARGO’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 56] (FIRST REQUEST) 1 STIPULATION 2 3 The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court enter an order, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, to extend the time for 4 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES 32 (“Collegium #32”), to 5 6 respond to the “Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Their Motion for Summary 7 Judgment [ECF No. 56]” (“MFR”) filed by Counterclaimant, FEDERAL HOME LOAN 8 MORTGAGE CORPORATION (“Freddie Mac”) and Defendant, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 9 (“Wells’ Fargo”) on August 2, 2017 as Doc. No. 57. Responses are currently due on August 16, 10 2017. The parties have agreed to extend the time to file responses to September 1, 2017. 11 12 September 29, 2017. 13 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone (702) 608-4232 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM Additionally, the parties have agreed that the reply to the response shall be due on or before 14 This is the first request and stipulation to respond to the motion to reconsider this Court’s 15 order denying Freddie Mac and Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The stipulation and 16 order are necessary to complete the briefing on the complex issues raised and revisited in the 17 MFR. The summer calendar of Collegium #32’s counsel also conflicts with preparing a timely 18 response to the MFR. This request is made in good faith and not submitted for any improper 19 purpose or delay. 20 21 ///// 22 ///// 23 ///// 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 2 1 It is so stipulated by the parties that the time to respond to the MFR will be extended from 2 August 16, 2017 to September 1, 2017. It is also stipulated by the parties that the reply to the 3 response shall be due on or before September 29, 2017. 4 5 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. By: /s/ Tara Clark Newberry Tara Clark Newberry, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10696 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Collegium Fund LLC Series 32 By: /s/ Nathan G. Kanute Nathan G. Kanute, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 1241350 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501-1961 Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bak, N.A. and Federeal Home Loan Mortgge Corporation DATED: August 14, 2017 DATED: August 14, 2017 ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC PENGILLY LAW FIRM By: /s/ Shane D. Cox Shane D. Cox, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13852 8440 w. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 210 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorneys for Absolute Collection Services By: /s/ Elizabeth B. Lowell Elizabeth B. Lowell, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8551 David Markman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12440 1995 Village Center Circle, Ste. 190 Las Vegas, NV 89134 Attorneys for Nuevo Vista HOA 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone (702) 608-4232 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM 11 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: August 14, 2017 19 DATED: August 14, 2017 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED.August 17, 2017. 23 ______________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 DATED: _______________ 28 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on the 15th day of August 2017, I electronically submitted the 3 foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF 4 COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES 32 TO RESPOND TO FREDDIE MAC AND WELLS 5 FARGO’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING THEIR 6 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 56] (FIRST REQUEST) with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, using the electronic case file system of 7 the court. The electronic case file system sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to the following 8 individuals, who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by 9 electronic means. 10 Amy F. Sorenson asorenson@swlaw.com, Docket_LAS@swlaw.com, smoen@swlaw.com DOCKET_SLC@swlaw.com 12 Nathan Guy Kanute nkanute@swlaw.com, dcalhoun@swlaw.com, ljtaylor@swlaw.com Craig S Denney craig.denney@ssa.gov 16 David A Markman dmarkman@pengillylawfirm.com, cschnider@pengillylawfirm.com, oschulze@pengillylawfirm.com, reception@pengillylawfirm.com 17 Elizabeth B Lowell elowell@pengillylawfirm.com 18 James W Pengilly jpengilly@pengillylawfirm.com Shane D. Cox shane@absolute-collection.com 13 7854 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Telephone (702) 608-4232 CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM 11 14 15 19 20 21 /s/ Kathleen Seckinger Kathleen Seckinger, an Employee of CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?