Collegium Fund Series 32 v. Snyder et al
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 57 Motion (First Request). Responses due by 9/1/2017. Replies due by 9/29/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
Tara Clark Newberry, Esq. (SBN: 10696)
tnewberry@cnlawlv.com
7854 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Telephone: (702) 608-4232
Facsimile: (702) 946-1380
Attorney for Collegium Fund LLC Series 32
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
COLLEGIUM FUND SERIES 32, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company,
10
Plaintiff,
11
13
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone (702) 608-4232
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
vs.
12
14
15
MARK DANIEL SNYDER, an individual;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; DOES I
through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1
through 10,
Defendants,
16
17
18
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
banking association, and FEDERAL HOME
LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
19
Counter-Claimants,
20
21
22
23
24
25
vs.
COLLEGIUM FUND SERIES 32, a Nevada
limited-liability company; ABSOLUTE
COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; NUEVO VISTA
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a
Nevada non-profit cooperative corporation;
26
Counter-Defendant.
27
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
28
1
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-01640-JCM-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF
COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES
32 TO RESPOND TO FREDDIE
MAC AND WELLS FARGO’S
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER
DENYING THEIR MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO.
56]
(FIRST REQUEST)
1
STIPULATION
2
3
The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request
that this Court enter an order, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, to extend the time for
4
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES 32 (“Collegium #32”), to
5
6
respond to the “Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Their Motion for Summary
7
Judgment [ECF No. 56]” (“MFR”) filed by Counterclaimant, FEDERAL HOME LOAN
8
MORTGAGE CORPORATION (“Freddie Mac”) and Defendant, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
9
(“Wells’ Fargo”) on August 2, 2017 as Doc. No. 57. Responses are currently due on August 16,
10
2017. The parties have agreed to extend the time to file responses to September 1, 2017.
11
12
September 29, 2017.
13
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone (702) 608-4232
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
Additionally, the parties have agreed that the reply to the response shall be due on or before
14
This is the first request and stipulation to respond to the motion to reconsider this Court’s
15
order denying Freddie Mac and Wells Fargo’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The stipulation and
16
order are necessary to complete the briefing on the complex issues raised and revisited in the
17
MFR. The summer calendar of Collegium #32’s counsel also conflicts with preparing a timely
18
response to the MFR. This request is made in good faith and not submitted for any improper
19
purpose or delay.
20
21
/////
22
/////
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
2
1
It is so stipulated by the parties that the time to respond to the MFR will be extended from
2
August 16, 2017 to September 1, 2017. It is also stipulated by the parties that the reply to the
3
response shall be due on or before September 29, 2017.
4
5
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
By:
/s/ Tara Clark Newberry
Tara Clark Newberry, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10696
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for
Collegium Fund LLC Series 32
By:
/s/ Nathan G. Kanute
Nathan G. Kanute, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 1241350 West Liberty
Street, Suite 510
Reno, Nevada 89501-1961
Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bak, N.A. and
Federeal Home Loan Mortgge Corporation
DATED: August 14, 2017
DATED: August 14, 2017
ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES,
LLC
PENGILLY LAW FIRM
By:
/s/ Shane D. Cox
Shane D. Cox, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13852
8440 w. Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 210
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorneys for Absolute Collection Services
By:
/s/ Elizabeth B. Lowell
Elizabeth B. Lowell, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8551
David Markman, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12440
1995 Village Center Circle, Ste. 190
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Attorneys for Nuevo Vista HOA
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone (702) 608-4232
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
11
14
15
16
17
18
DATED: August 14, 2017
19
DATED: August 14, 2017
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.August 17, 2017.
23
______________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
DATED: _______________
28
3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on the 15th day of August 2017, I electronically submitted the
3
foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF
4
COLLEGIUM FUND LLC SERIES 32 TO RESPOND TO FREDDIE MAC AND WELLS
5
FARGO’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING THEIR
6
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 56] (FIRST REQUEST) with the clerk
of the court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, using the electronic case file system of
7
the court. The electronic case file system sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to the following
8
individuals, who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by
9
electronic means.
10
Amy F. Sorenson
asorenson@swlaw.com, Docket_LAS@swlaw.com, smoen@swlaw.com
DOCKET_SLC@swlaw.com
12
Nathan Guy Kanute
nkanute@swlaw.com, dcalhoun@swlaw.com, ljtaylor@swlaw.com
Craig S Denney
craig.denney@ssa.gov
16
David A Markman
dmarkman@pengillylawfirm.com, cschnider@pengillylawfirm.com,
oschulze@pengillylawfirm.com, reception@pengillylawfirm.com
17
Elizabeth B Lowell
elowell@pengillylawfirm.com
18
James W Pengilly
jpengilly@pengillylawfirm.com
Shane D. Cox
shane@absolute-collection.com
13
7854 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone (702) 608-4232
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
11
14
15
19
20
21
/s/ Kathleen Seckinger
Kathleen Seckinger, an Employee of
CLARK NEWBERRY LAW FIRM
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?