Konecne et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 76 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 68 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order/Ruling LR IB 3-1 (Second Request). Responses due by 1/3/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 76 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 2

1 CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
2 Email: [e-mail]
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
3 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
4 Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
5 Attorney for Allied Van Lines, Inc. and
Berger Transfer and Storage, Inc.
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10 MEGHAN KONECNE and HOWARD
MISLE, individually and as husband and wife,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., a foreign
14 corporation; BERGER TRANSFER &
STORAGE, INC., a foreign corporation; and
15 DOES I-V, ROES VI-X,

Case No. 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE
ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION
TO REOPEN DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 68)
(SECOND REQUEST)
ORDER

Defendants.

16
17
18

The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby

19 agree and stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for DEFENDANT
20 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC. (“Defendant”) to file its Response to Plaintiffs’ Objection to
21 Magistrate Order Denying Renewed Motion to Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 68). The deadline for
22 the Response is currently set for December 20, 2017. As previous set forth in the parties’ first
23 request (ECF No. 71, which this Court granted on December 7, 2017 (ECF No. 72)), the parties
24 have reached a tentative settlement agreement, but require additional time to finalize the
25 settlement documents. This remains the case, and with the coming end-of-year holidays, the
26 parties require additional time to accommodate the parties’ and their counsel’s schedules. As
27 such, extending the due date for Defendant’s Response by two weeks (to January 3, 2017) should

LEWIS

28 afford the parties sufficient time to finalize the agreement, thereby bringing this matter to a

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

4830-6148-2073.1

2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery

Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 76 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 2

1 resolution and thus obviating the need for a response to ECF No. 68.
This is the parties’ second request for an extended briefing deadline to respond to ECF No.

2
3 68.
4

The proposed extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

6

DATED this 20th day of December 2017.

DATED this 20th day of December 2017.

7

FENNEMORE CRAIG, PC

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

/s/ Brenoch R. Wirthlin
BRENOCH R. WIRTHLIN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10282
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendants

8
9
10
11

/s/ Cheryl A. Grames

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: this ____ day of _______________, 2017.
Dated December 21, 2017.

16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWIS

28

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

4830-6148-2073.1

2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
2
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery