Konecne et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 84

ORDER Granting 83 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 68 Objection Magistrate Judge Order (Third Request). Responses due by 1/10/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 83 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 2 1 CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12752 2 Email: Cheryl.Grames@LewisBrisbois.com LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 3 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 4 Telephone (702) 893-3383 Fax (702) 893-3789 5 Attorney for Allied Van Lines, Inc. and Berger Transfer and Storage, Inc. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 MEGHAN KONECNE and HOWARD MISLE, individually and as husband and wife, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., a foreign 14 corporation; BERGER TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC., a foreign corporation; and 15 DOES I-V, ROES VI-X, Case No. 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 68) (THIRD REQUEST) ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby 19 agree and stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for DEFENDANT 20 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC. (“Defendant”) to file its Response to Plaintiffs’ Objection to 21 Magistrate Order Denying Renewed Motion to Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 68). The deadline for 22 the Response is currently set for January 3, 2017, however, the parties require an additional brief 23 extension of this deadline to accommodate the need to finalize their settlement agreement. The 24 parties anticipate that extending the due date for Defendant’s Response by one week (to January 25 10, 2017) should afford the parties sufficient time to finalize the agreement, thereby bringing this 26 matter to a resolution and thus obviating the need for a response to ECF No. 68. 27 LEWIS This is the parties’ third request for an extended briefing deadline to respond to ECF No. 28 68. BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4851-6366-6010.1 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 83 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 2 1 The proposed extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party. 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 DATED this 3rd day of January 2018. DATED this 3rd day of January 2018. 4 FENNEMORE CRAIG, PC LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP /s/ Brenoch R. Wirthlin BRENOCH R. WIRTHLIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10282 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12752 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Defendants 5 6 7 8 /s/ Cheryl A. Grames 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:this ____4, 2018._______________, 2018. Dated January day of 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4851-6366-6010.1 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW 2 Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?