Konecne et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
Filing
84
ORDER Granting 83 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 68 Objection Magistrate Judge Order (Third Request). Responses due by 1/10/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 83 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 2
1 CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
2 Email: Cheryl.Grames@LewisBrisbois.com
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
3 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
4 Telephone (702) 893-3383
Fax (702) 893-3789
5 Attorney for Allied Van Lines, Inc. and
Berger Transfer and Storage, Inc.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10 MEGHAN KONECNE and HOWARD
MISLE, individually and as husband and wife,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., a foreign
14 corporation; BERGER TRANSFER &
STORAGE, INC., a foreign corporation; and
15 DOES I-V, ROES VI-X,
Case No. 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE
ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION
TO REOPEN DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 68)
(THIRD REQUEST)
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
18
The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby
19 agree and stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for DEFENDANT
20 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC. (“Defendant”) to file its Response to Plaintiffs’ Objection to
21 Magistrate Order Denying Renewed Motion to Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 68). The deadline for
22 the Response is currently set for January 3, 2017, however, the parties require an additional brief
23 extension of this deadline to accommodate the need to finalize their settlement agreement. The
24 parties anticipate that extending the due date for Defendant’s Response by one week (to January
25 10, 2017) should afford the parties sufficient time to finalize the agreement, thereby bringing this
26 matter to a resolution and thus obviating the need for a response to ECF No. 68.
27
LEWIS
This is the parties’ third request for an extended briefing deadline to respond to ECF No.
28 68.
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4851-6366-6010.1
2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery
Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 83 Filed 01/03/18 Page 2 of 2
1
The proposed extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party.
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3
DATED this 3rd day of January 2018.
DATED this 3rd day of January 2018.
4
FENNEMORE CRAIG, PC
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
/s/ Brenoch R. Wirthlin
BRENOCH R. WIRTHLIN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10282
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendants
5
6
7
8
/s/ Cheryl A. Grames
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:this ____4, 2018._______________, 2018.
Dated January day of
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4851-6366-6010.1
2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
2
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Discovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?