Konecne et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
Filing
96
ORDER Granting 93 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 71 Motion (Third Request). Responses due by 2/6/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 93 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 2
1 CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
2 Email: Cheryl.Grames@LewisBrisbois.com
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
3
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Telephone (702) 893-3383
5 Fax (702) 893-3789
Attorney for Allied Van Lines, Inc. and
6 Berger Transfer and Storage, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
MEGHAN KONECNE and HOWARD
11 MISLE, individually and as husband and wife,
Case No. 2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
12
REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF
UNDER RULE 60(b) (ECF NO. 71)
13
Plaintiffs,
vs.
14 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., a foreign
corporation; BERGER TRANSFER &
15 STORAGE, INC., a foreign corporation; and
DOES I-V, ROES VI-X,
16
Defendants.
17
(THIRD REQUEST)
18
19
The above-referenced parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby
20 agree and stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, to extend the deadline for Defendant Allied
21 Van Lines, Inc. (“Defendant”) to respond to Plaintiffs Megan Konecne’s and Howard Misle’s
22 (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Relief under FRCP 60(b) (ECF No. 71, filed on December 6, 2017). As
23 the parties have set forth in their other stipulations (all approved by the Court), the parties still
24 require additional time to finalize the settlement agreement. In the past week, the parties have
25 conferred several times in an attempt to resolve the final form of their settlement agreement. As
26 such, extending the due date for Defendant’s response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief
27 (ECF No. 71) from January 23, 2018 to February 6, 2018 should afford the parties sufficient time
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 to finalize the agreement, thereby bringing this matter to a resolution and thus obviating the need
4852-7591-8682.1
2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
Request to Extend Deadline to Respond to ECF No. 71
(First Request)
Case 2:16-cv-01655-APG-GWF Document 93 Filed 01/23/18 Page 2 of 2
1 for filing any responses.
2
This is the parties’ third request to extend the deadline by which Defendant may file a
3 Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief under Rule 60(b) (ECF No. 71).
4
The proposed extension is requested in good faith and will not prejudice any party.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
DATED this 23rd day of January 2018.
DATED this 23rd day of January 2018.
7
FENNEMORE CRAIG, PC
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
/s/ Brenoch R. Wirthlin
BRENOCH R. WIRTHLIN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10282
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Cheryl A. Grames
CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12752
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January day of _______________, 2018.
Dated this ____ 25, 2018.
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4852-7591-8682.1
2
Request to Extend Deadline to Respond to ECF No. 71
(First Request)
2:16-CV-01655-APG-GFW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?