Zambrano v. Cardenas Markets, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER Denying 17 Stipulation without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/27/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 FELICITAS ZAMBRANO, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 v. 13 CARDENAS MARKETS, INC., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-01659-GMN-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 17) 16 Pending before the Court is a motion to extend the expert and rebuttal expert disclosure 17 deadlines. Docket No. 17. As currently requested, the parties seek an expert disclosure deadline roughly 18 two weeks before the close of discovery and a rebuttal expert deadline nearly two months after the close 19 of discovery. Compare Docket No. 9 with Docket No. 17. Such a schedule does not make sense. 20 Moreover, without explanation, the parties seek a 60-day period between the expert deadlines, rather 21 than the presumptively reasonable 30-day period. Compare Docket No. 17 with Local Rule 26-1(b).1 22 Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED without prejudice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: October 27, 2016 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 1 Similarly, while the stipulation indicates it seeks a 45-day extension, it actually seeks a roughly 75day extension with respect to the rebuttal expert deadline. Compare Docket No. 9 with Docket No. 17.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?