Muffrey LLC et al v. KMart Corporation

Filing 34

ORDER that 25 Motion to Conduct an Immediate Visual Site Inspection is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6

MUFFREY, LLC, et al.,

7

Plaintiff(s),

8

vs.

9

KMART CORPORATION, et al.,

10

Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-01661-GMN-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 25)

11
12

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ emergency motion to conduct an immediate visual site

13

inspection of the property at the center of the instant case, filed on February 1, 2017. Docket No.

14

25. Defendant Kmart Corporation filed a response, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 31, 32.

15

Before Plaintiffs filed this motion, the parties scheduled an expert inspection of the property to occur

16

on February 13-14, 2017. See, e.g., Docket No. 25-1 at 4. However, Plaintiffs submit that they wish

17

to conduct an additional, earlier inspection of the property because of recent floods in the area that

18

may have damaged it. See, e.g., Docket No. 25 at 3-4. Plaintiffs fail to provide any support for the

19

extraordinary relief they request. See Docket No. 25. Further, in their reply, filed on February 8,

20

2017, Plaintiffs concede that “[e]mergency inspection is practically impossible.” Docket No. 32 at

21

3. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion, Docket No. 25, as moot.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED: February 10, 2017

24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge