Saporito v. Townes
Filing
11
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1 the petition to confirm the FINRA arbitration award is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the petitioners and against Respondent Gregory A. Townes in the amount of $136,200.00 and close this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 the motion for entry of clerk's default is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
In the Matter between
5
Wanda Saporito and Michael Saporito,
individually and as Trustees of the Saporito
Trust dtd 12/20/2000,
6
7
Petitioners
8
Order Confirming Arbitration Award and
Denying Request for Default as Moot
[ECF Nos. 1, 8]
v.
9
2:16-cv-01670-JAD-VCF
Gregory A. Townes,
10
Respondent
11
Wanda and Michael Saporito petition this court to confirm the award they received
12
13
against Gregory A. Townes in an arbitration conducted before the Financial Industry Regulatory
14
Authority (FINRA). The arbitrator’s December 2, 2015, decision awarded the Saporitos:
15
$90,000 in compensatory damages; $45,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs; $975 in additional fees;
16
and their $225 FINRA dispute-resolution filing fee.1 The Saporitos timely moved to confirm the
17
award and convert it into a judgment.2 Townes has not appeared in this case3 nor has he opposed
18
the motion to confirm the arbitration award or filed a motion to vacate or modify it during the
19
last year in which the award has been entered.4
A district court’s review of an arbitration award is limited by the Federal Arbitration Act,
20
21
and “a court must confirm an arbitration award unless it is vacated, modified, or corrected as
22
23
24
1
ECF No. 1 at 12.
2
ECF No. 1; 9 U.S.C. § 9.
25
3
26
27
28
The arbitrator’s award notes that Townes did not participate in the arbitration proceeding either,
despite having been properly served. ECF No. 1 at 11.
4
See 9 U.S.C. § 12 (“Notice of a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award must be served
upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is filed or delivered.”).
1
prescribed” by the Act.5 In this case, the FINRA arbitrator issued an award explaining the basis
2
for FINRA jurisdiction and the basis for his award. Townes—whom the arbitrator concluded had
3
been properly served—did not participate in the arbitration; nevertheless, the arbitrator did not
4
award the full $325,000 that the Saporitos requested.6 The arbitrator denied the Saporitos’
5
request for punitive and exemplary damages.7 Townes has not participated in this confirmation
6
proceeding either. He has not offered any reason that the award should be vacated, modified, or
7
corrected, and I do not perceive any. Accordingly, with good cause appearing,
8
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition to confirm
the FINRA arbitration award [ECF No. 1] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to
10
enter judgment in favor of the petitioners and against Respondent Gregory A. Townes in
11
the amount of $136,200.00 and close this case.
12
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for entry of clerk’s default [ECF No. 8] is
DENIED as moot.
14
DATED: December 27, 2016
15
_______________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
5
Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp., 668 F.3d 655, 662 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Bosack v. Soward,
586 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 2009)).
6
ECF No. 1 at 11–12.
7
Id.
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?