Flores v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER that 39 Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
LEONARD FLORES,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:16-cv-01676-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 39)

16

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion. Docket No. 39. Defendant Wells Fargo filed a

17

response in opposition and Defendant Ten-X filed a joinder. Docket Nos. 40-41. The Court finds that

18

the motion lacks merit and, therefore, it is DENIED.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

DATED: December 29, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge